The animals were felt here as well and the

The animals were felt here as well and the logic was only formed. Well, here is this one that you know for patomskoye when dividing a man when a bird is a biped creature without feathers when Diogenes is an atomically difficult definition of a person here Plato went in a simple way, he pointed out the distinctive qualities of a new creature without feathers, and there and Diogenes after that, when he threw at the feet of Plato plucked with wide claws. And then write the definition. And we descended spiders. Never a bell without feathers with flat nails turned out to be defined in principle this is really What definition is that called But that's probably what we should do when we try to define a person to keep in mind not only the distinctive essential qualities or essential ones here and here The key question and what such a person's qualities are clearly not the ear is not feathers are not nails here in fact and is born a question the issue of uniqueness Check passes the question of the essence of man and here I would say there are two such directions 2 opposing approaches I would say methodological 1 for example And I would have called it in the twentieth century. That's how it was called essentialism. According to this concept, there is a certain mean often trying to define through some one essential qualities of a person. This person is a sensible person. This being is a playing person. This creature has a sense of humor.