In fact i have, it was a critical discussion of Dan's URI proposal (although as so often i grasped a few aspects of his - unmentioned - preconditions only later, and since have adapted my position, well that's actually a reason to do a new post... maybe in June ;-) )
Anyhow, what i meant is expressed like this (in relation to URI):

Let’s imagine you own a house and you can generate a realistic income via rentals of 10% net, you would be effectively taxed 50% of your income. So what you would do, knowing that your tenants do have a basic income anyway, you just double the rent, to have a more decent net revenue, and you tenants are likely to pay, a) beacuse they need a place to live b) they can afford, it because the have their basic income + income from their own business operations. So the result would be a soaring inflation and leveling of the effect of the UBI.

Here is the full article: https://trybe.one/uri-why-universal-resource-income-wont-come/