You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is the eosDAC airdrop a form of vote buying?

in #eos7 years ago

@lukestokes this was really fascinating to listen to. You guys are leading the charge, and I love that you share your logic as deal with the ethical situations you face.

I really like the idea of EOSdac helping create other DACs. When you talked about the possibility of the launch team being voted out - is there a way to minimise that risk?

The world is lucky to have people like you fighting the good fight. This is my favourite video of yours so far.

Also, how do EOS holders vote for Block Producers?

Sort:  

is there a way to minimise that risk?

Maybe. We airdropped 75% of the tokens. The rest are talked about here:

In order to create an EOS block-producer that is owned by the EOS community itself, BlockMaker Ltd has allocated 75% of eosDAC tokens to be airdropped to the EOS token holders themselves. 25% of the tokens have been given to the Launch Team, Advisors, Community Supporters and eosDAC Ltd. Without their free contribution of time, energy and financial resources eosDAC would not have come into existence.

If those who are involved early really get it, that may be enough to keep the control and set the DNA for the DAC to thrive.

Also, how do EOS holders vote for Block Producers?

There is no easy interface for this yet, that I know of, but we'll definitely be talking about this more once the tools are available and the chain launches.