You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: EOS - State of the constitution
Thank you Thierry for your comprehensive explanation. As regards the coma, scenario, we should not forget, that 3.1 years of coma is, or maybe someone lost in the jungle is a veeeeery rare event, and offchain you are likely declared dead anyway after such long period of times. I think in such scenarios the heirs can easily claim the funds via arbitration, just like with other assets.
Hi @tsto, @conceptskip
Thank you for this brilliant and amazing reply @tsto! :)
Im very sorry for such a delay with my replies but currently Ive been overwhelmed with amount of work that has been related to my latest contest. I never expected to receive such an amazing support.
Thank you for sharing your view. Just wanted to let you know that finally I had a chance to read your comment. Appreciate your time.
I actually agree with you tsto. I've been thinking about coma or other accidents. What if something happend to me and I will end up in hospital for 1 year and last transaction I did on EOS was 2,5 year ago.
Why @conceptskip would you assume that coma/some tragedy would have to happend only right after your last transaction?
What if you had accident and lost your memory ? What EOS came up with us just wrong and will put off many potential investors.
Enjoy your weekend :)
Yours
Piotr
Hi @crypto.piotr, thanks for your valuable addition, it's a good point you bring up, with your example. The new constitution proposal, which is likely to succeed, will remove that paragraph entirely. Yet I think it would be worthwhile to deal with inactive accounts, maybe bye only renting out their resources until reclaimed.