Steem has excellent security on accounts, but very poor governance. The community reward pool is the preverbal wallet on the park bench. Those who are voting for themselves and hiding behind pseudo-anonymous accounts are thieves stealing from the community. Those censoring posts on EOS through use of down votes of posts that decline rewards are not held accountable to community standards of behavior.

And are those downvoting my utopian contributions held accountable to community standards of behavior? Don't you think your attack on bernie is one sided? I totally agree that what burnie does is not right but is it right that a single person gets 2% of the reward pool?

I can see that you upvoted haejin's comment with 70$ but how would you establish "proper governance the Steem reward pool" if you are giving away 70$ to a comment, not even a post but a comment. That comment has a 150$ payout.

With proper governance the Steem reward pool would not be pilfered for private gain. Achieving this requires much stronger transparency with identity verification and dispute resolution systems combined with incentive structures that disincentives self-voting (like n2 curve).

You do understand that you sound like a total hypocrite? At one point you are talking about freedom of expression on the other you are supporting people censoring others. Haejin has sunk a horde of posts by his critics and you appear to be taking the side of those attacking free speech.