You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: EOS - will the successful launch remain strained forever?

in #eos6 years ago (edited)

A few weeks ago, Big.one took the initiative to organize an election simulation.

The condition to be able to participate to the this simulation was:

  • To open an account with them
  • To send 1 EOS on there platform and accept to "freeze" it for the duration of the voting simulation.

I do not have the exact number of participants as Big.One is not a champion for transparency*, but I know a lot of people all around the globe has been sending at least 1 EOS in order to be able to participate to the simulation (like I did).

The funny thing is that when I wanted to get this 1 EOS out from Big.One (once the simulation was over), the withdrawal procedure did not worked.

After that, I have sent an email to complain. They did not answered to my question. They simply told me that to withdraw my 1 EOS involves a fee of 0.1 EOS (10% in my case!) When I tried a second time to withdraw, same as the first time, I was not able to go through the withdrawal process. My feeling at this point was already a negative one.

Today, I'm reading your article and I understand now the final goal they were targeting, self-voting for themselves with there customer's Token!!!

Big.One deserves a huge sanction! I invite all the community to cancell the votes they have given to Big.One and re-attribute them to straight and honest teams who deserves to be elected!

Have a nice day, keep acting in a honest way!
Thierry

*I'm going to take some time to study Big.One's ETH wallet in order to evaluate how many EOS they received for this simulation of vote

Sort:  

Hi Thierry thank you for this valuable information. I'd like to recommend to also share in the eosgov telegram group, they are having a heated discussion about how to build an arbitration case, so your info and reason to stand is just what they are looking for