I think I've ran across Dr. Berg before and I like what he says.

My aside up in the post about eggs being bad again refers to that study Dr. Beg is talking about, I think. In the past, I may have been somewhat concerned when something was determined to be bad for, but I've seen enough back and forth on different foods now to get that depending on various factors, a lot of good things can appear bad, and bad things good, if the criteria used and the data collected can be packed either way.

For me, it's getting to what's going to be healthy intake for me—one that keeps all the levels of the bad stuff down and all the good stuff up, and manages to keep me within acceptable weight/size levels, with the energy and strength I need throughout the day, with a minimum of aches and other unwanted ailments.

You definitely know this from your own experience that not all foods are created equal for all people, and that's pretty much where I need to get to I think.