You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: "SLC21/WK6: Comprensión de las quemaduras: tipos, causas y respuestas de primeros auxilios"

Student Name: @karianaporras
Overall grade: 7.8
Plagiarism Check: Pass
AI Use: no

QuestionWhat the Student Did WellAreas for ImprovementGrading
Question 1Provided the course of action in this specific situation . Good workImportant details are missing such as the student didn't mention prioritizing their own safety first. This is a very important step. There's no mention of gloves or a wrapper. There's no mention of giving the child psychological support which is an essential step in these sort of accidens.[Grade: 1.4]
Question 2the student listed down the course of action for an electrical burn.[Grade: 2]
Question 3Listed the steps of managing an emergency chemical burning scenario.The problem in the first aid was not flushing the burn site for a longer period of time. Atleast 20 minutes of flushing is recommended for a chemical burn. You didn't mention using PPEs or prioritizing your own safety first. You didn't mention calling for medical support[Grade: 1.6]
Question 4The student managed to present their logic in choosing the answer.The ethics as well as the Triage dictate that the patient with a 2nd degree burn should be treated first as the patient with a third degree burn has his nerves damaged so currently he is not in severe pain whereas the patient with a 2nd degree burn might be going through excruciating pain and if not attended immediately would be left with grave consequences. There's not enough sufficient medical or ethical reasoning given by the student[Grade: 0.8]
Question 5the student managed to present an infographic. Infographics in the medicine field serve as important tool for having access to more information in a single place. These are typically necessary to have as a first aider.[Grade: 2]

General Feedback: The student has shown a good understanding of this week's course. I definitely enjoyed reading your article. There were a few shortcomings which I'm sure will be avoided in the upcoming posts.
Thank you.

Regards,
@huzaifanaveed1