You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Flag, The Down Vote... my semi-frequent update to this idea... hopefully those in favor of the downvote read it
Well, it seems to be one of those things that's exacerbated because of the fairly small number of users and the skewed distribution of stake right now. If this was a platform six months or a year into the future with 100,000+ active daily, or even weekly users, would those things even make a difference? If distribution of STEEM Power was more like 5000 users holding the top 20%, would we still have to worry about gaming and collusion like that? I can't imagine it would be as big of a deal as it would be in the current environment.
I believe it will always be a potential problem. Especially for new users. They are the ones that can get swatted like a fly. I HOPE that it would get better.
We also have pretty smart users. What happens when some wealthy SJWs join, and swat anyone that triggers them, and swat all of that person's posts.
I think it could get worse if we get bigger, because we'll likely attract a lot different type of people.
But if it's upvote only, they couldn't do that. That's what I was talking about in my comment above.
Sure. Yet in an up vote only situation how would we stop sock puppets from getting most of the steem power votes, powering up themselves, and then voting on even more sock puppets? You could quickly have a concentration of power with no real way to tame it.
It sounds like Dan is in favor of up vote only if a way can be devised that is resistant to quickly being gamed.