RE: Question : At what height do we see curvature
Believing in bigfoot is seen as ridiculous because it's a very uncommon belief that's contrary to what mainstream science teaches... so it's weird for a flat-Earther to use "this is like saying you've seen bigfoot" as if it's a diss.
Well, that makes two of us giving up on repeating ourselves.
Since causing things to move is one of the defining properties of a force, and you said "density causes objects to rise and fall, not gravity", it's you who said density needed to be a force.
You obviously have no idea what "devil's advocate" means.
If I wanted a debate that involved actual research, I'd debate people with more plausible beliefs than flat-Earthers, who have some chance of actually proving me wrong - like Marxists or Young Earth Creationists. Or people who think Bigfoot is real.
lmao , this is what wiki says about gravity my friend (where force is concerned)
Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental forces of physics, approximately 1038 times weaker than the strong force, 1036 times weaker than the electromagnetic force and 1029 times weaker than the weak force. As a consequence, it has no significant influence at the level of subatomic particles.
you sir have no foundation , yet you contradict yourself
"I'd debate people with more plausible beliefs than flat-Earthers, who have some chance of actually proving me wrong - like Marxists or Young Earth Creationists. Or people who think Bigfoot is real."
i used bigfoot to show you how stupid belief is , but apparently you have to tap dance than give me anything tangble. Fact is , you only debate people who are misinformed and you see their flaws , you have no argument but your focusing on bigfoot now lmao. let people enjoy flat earth instead of being a douche who cant prove anything , why dont you go to syria or something and tell muslims their god is false , lol im sure that wont end well , but you pick of flat earthers because why , we are asking questions? lol sure im not phased by your wordplay. nice try :)
What part of anything I said contradicts those facts about gravity in any way? Although, you're missing a superscript there, 10^38 and 1038 are very different things.
Most flatearth posts are "here's why the Earth is flat" or very thinly veiled versions of that like "just asking questions". That's effectively an invitation to debate, even if the real intention is "see, no-one had the guts to respond! I guess that means the Earth really is flat!" - some self-destructive part of me that wants to waste time on stupid arguments on the internet is drawn to that skinnerbox, where actual ideologies worth debating are more posting about internal debates over minutiae or other fights that aren't as easy to jump into as "Is the Earth flat Y/N?".
Also, flatearthism is a literal conspiracy theory, so the burden of proof is on you guys.
so you debate someone who you think is stupid and that makes you intelligent, , its not my job to wake the sheeple up , but i will live in my reality as opposed to some guy on the internet that profits off misinformation. at one point you didn't have any clue what cryptocurrencies were, you where presented with information and you did your research so you wont be fooled by refferal whores , pump and dumpers , scammers , so save me your non sense. how can you debate something you have no knowledge of bruh , research it yourself, make it a field of study instead of a just believe, it doesnt matter which is correct , but im not going to take anyones word , mathematical equation , theory , religious believe of what i experience daily on earth , its that simple , i dont care to convince anyone , but i'll make my message curate regardless. so dont waste your time bro, i dont go in peoples churches trying to tell them there is no jesus , unless your inviting for an opposing opinion, we both are on opposing ends of the conversation , nasa are the ones with the money putting out the brainwash , im just a ordinary person , what the fuck can i do bruh , i cant build hedron collidors , parabolic rockets , i might be able to create a ball earth simulation for you, vice versa , its highly unlikely you have any convincing evidence, other than your content spun rethoric.
the mayans existed more than 20,000 years ago , their depiction of the cosmos was not a ball i can say that as a fact , your so called heliocentric model is new , the original doesnt have to prove it self. fyi , 99% of people who are flat earthers now , where globe earthers at some point , globe earthers are never open minded to the subject so its no wonder you cant assimilate the information in a rational way , no body asking you to believe flat earth , it exists , your probably but hurt because your coins literally cant and will never reach the moon , it will create the illusion but , alt coin developers are happy to keep you sheeps occupied and distracted , aruging with people for knowledge you barely even know. 75% of your indoctrinated version of the universe is a mystery , they call it dark matter lmao , braddda , u do not know de wey , send me a selfie when mars is terraformed
Wow, getting really defensive now. Which was it that triggered you, "literal conspiracy theory", or "burden of proof"?
lmao what are you talking about now , triggered what? your on some bs lmao , you can have that , though , i can keep this conversation going on forever and have no malice , your opinions are epic though , you think im being defensive , im just calling out your bullshit and the reality of things , when your sailing your boats on neptune , send me some photos , THEN i might admit i was wrong , or just be like globe earthers and just ignore it and say the burden on proof is on the other guy, or your apart of an occult or some weird shit little girls do when they cant win an argument, are you done or are you finished , you want more of this work , i dont mind , i might actually learn something but your not really making an effort to educate , your intentionally trying to get me emotional , lmao this is rich , thanks bro i had a good laugh with your this tiny post. my opinions certainly mean nothing to you , what makes you think yours do?
"Triggered" as in an incoherent rant like this suggests a strong emotional reaction that wouldn't normally be warranted, analogous to someone with PTSD having flashbacks triggered by mundane events. Also I'm using that to imply you're so irrational that hearing about basic concepts like "the burden of proof" is traumatic for you.
Going on another similar rant about "boats on neptune" and "apart of an occult" is not exactly helping your case.
your hilarious bro , how does one detect emotions behind a computer screen, opinions are very nice to have but it should be kept to yourself, debate the information, not me , i am not the earth lmao
"I'm not butthurt, how would you even know I'm butthurt through a computer screen?" - you, being butthurt.
And yeah, "the information", minus all the information that your literal conspiracy theory has decided must be fake.