You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: FOUNDATION PROPOSAL: The Merger
The additional sentence clarifies what the account will be doing in not voting for witnesses.
I'm still stuck on:
... unless said member is a witness themselves and are speaking from a non-Foundation standpoint.
Why do they have to be a witness themselves?
Support for individual witnesses should never be implied, directly or indirectly, by any Foundation account or active board member unless said member is speaking from a non-Foundation standpoint.
e.g. Any board member can speak positively or negatively (by votes or text) towards a witness as long as they aren't using the foundation account?
Good luck on this! :D
As long as they are not using a foundation account OR representing themselves as being part of it.
That is pretty standard in any organization I've been part of leadership with, when speaking on a matter there has to be clarity if speaking personally or as part of the group leadership.
Yes I understand, just wanted it to be clear in the text so that it's simple and there can be no doubt :)
!ENGAGE 50
Here are your
ENGAGEtokens!To view or trade
ENGAGEgo to steem-engine.com.