You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: DeCentraSteem - final proposal for a decentralised structure in favour of communities on Steem

I say it is a good scheme. I think a validation process will be needed to prevent individuals with alts tarnishing the credibility of the votes/decision making in inter-circle activities.

Sort:  

Thanks for your comment. We thought this rule would be enough to deal with this kind of problem:

Rule no 5 Voting

Whenever voting is required amongst the members of the working circles it is done i the following manner: because of the limited number of circle members voting is based on head count. To ensure accountability only those envealing their identity may vote.

Did we miss something? Should the rule be bettered in some way?