I think, most would not like loosing the "freedom" to be a tyrant in other peoples lives. I think that's the main reason. They want others to work for their food and water, and their good life, and don't want to be a slave but want to have a few that work for them. They use the mechanism of government, how inadequate it may be, to do the tyrant part for them, even there they don't want to take responsibility for their own lives.
They do it unconsciously. If they would have to do it on their own behalf, taking full responsibility for their actions, everything would change instantly. It's easy to vote for more income by redistribution when the violence behind it is covered by ridiculous political rituals and fancy uniforms. It's not easy to threaten, hurt and kill innocent people personally face to face.
I wouldn't say that freedom is unpopular. On the contrary, people find the idea of freedom very appealing. It just has a very different meaning depending on who you ask.
One guy considers himself free if he does not have to work while still living a good life.
Another guy just doesn't want to be a slave, another one may find the idea of being reliant on food, water and air to live imprisoning.
That being said, I think that steemit has a lot of potencial, but as with everything, utilizing that potencial doesn't come easy.
Why is it then, that it's NOT the tyrant that holds back the one who wants to be free? Why is it that it's the house slaves that hold him back and punish him?
Look at someone living in the working class and one day deciding that he wants to do more with his life, maybe doing some business, reaching for the stars. Friends, family, companions, hardly anyone will wholeheartly agree on saying that its a good idea, most will act rather aloof and reluctant.
It is basicly the same scenario as you just described, it is always a matter of perspective.
I think, most would not like loosing the "freedom" to be a tyrant in other peoples lives. I think that's the main reason. They want others to work for their food and water, and their good life, and don't want to be a slave but want to have a few that work for them. They use the mechanism of government, how inadequate it may be, to do the tyrant part for them, even there they don't want to take responsibility for their own lives.
They do it unconsciously. If they would have to do it on their own behalf, taking full responsibility for their actions, everything would change instantly. It's easy to vote for more income by redistribution when the violence behind it is covered by ridiculous political rituals and fancy uniforms. It's not easy to threaten, hurt and kill innocent people personally face to face.
Posted using Partiko Android
I wouldn't say that freedom is unpopular. On the contrary, people find the idea of freedom very appealing. It just has a very different meaning depending on who you ask.
One guy considers himself free if he does not have to work while still living a good life.
Another guy just doesn't want to be a slave, another one may find the idea of being reliant on food, water and air to live imprisoning.
That being said, I think that steemit has a lot of potencial, but as with everything, utilizing that potencial doesn't come easy.
Why is it then, that it's NOT the tyrant that holds back the one who wants to be free? Why is it that it's the house slaves that hold him back and punish him?
Posted using Partiko Android
Probably because they just don't know better.
Look at someone living in the working class and one day deciding that he wants to do more with his life, maybe doing some business, reaching for the stars. Friends, family, companions, hardly anyone will wholeheartly agree on saying that its a good idea, most will act rather aloof and reluctant.
It is basicly the same scenario as you just described, it is always a matter of perspective.