So You Took An Oath to Defend and Preserve the Constitution.....For All Members of the Military and Police Forces
By Anna Von Reitz
Most of the people we talk to who say that they "took an oath to preserve and defend the Constitution"----including many military officers---- : (1) don't know what a Constitution is; (2) never seriously sat down and studied or thought about any one of the three Constitutions Americans are likely to encounter; (3) don't know which Constitution they took an Oath to.
This article is for all those people.
The greatest enemy we face every day is ignorance. The second greatest is sloth-- which leads to the careless "taking for granted" of things which should never be taken for granted.
A "constitution" is a debt agreement.
It lays out services to be provided, who is responsible for providing these services, how they will be administered, and who pays for the services.
Even a cursory glance at any one of the three (3) Constitutions Americans are likely to see reveals that, yes, indeed, all these matters are covered--howbeit, in different forms and by different parties.
No doubt it is a surprise to many that we have three Constitutions. Let's start there and review the facts.
There is "The Constitution for the united States of America" written and adopted in 1787. This is the actual Constitution forming the union of unincorporated organic land jurisdiction "States of America" into a union (a form of association) of sovereign states, doing business as the unincorporated United States of America. Notice that this unincorporated entity was created "for" the States of America. These "States" are also unincorporated entities. Notice that "unincorporated" is a synonym for "sovereign".
It was necessary to create and form this union of states first in order to have a central body responsible for exercising all the "powers" of the sovereign states in international jurisdiction BEFORE those powers could be exercised in common or separated out and delegated to any other party. This is the actual Constitution from which all other Constitutions (debt agreements for services) are derived and upon which they all depend for their existence.
So, the unincorporated United States of America was formed first, received the responsibility for exercising all international powers in 1787, and two years later, delegated nineteen of its enumerated powers to the British Monarch and His Proxy Government known as The United States of America as described and organized under The Constitution of the United States of America adopted in 1789. Notice that this foreign British-controlled "district government" was created "of" the United States of America --meaning "apart from, outside of, or belonging to" the United States of America.
Whereas the first Constitution was an agreement between the national governments of the individual sovereign states to form a union and to mutually operate both their international land and international sea jurisdiction powers under a supra-national union of their states known as the unincorporated United States of America, the second Constitution delegated nineteen of those international powers to a foreign territorial government run as a proxy government under strictly delegated powers by the British Monarch. The District of Columbia was carved out as a base of operations for this proxy government and it was also granted the ability to own and operate dock yards, arsenals, and similar facilities needed to exercise its delegated powers.
All the non-delegated "reserved" powers in international jurisdiction remained with the unincorporated United States of America and the sovereign states and people. See Amendment X.
After the so-called Civil War, which was never declared and never ended by any treaty (and was thus an illegal commercial mercenary action on our shores) the British-controlled federal territorial --- also known as "district government" reorganized itself as a for-profit governmental services corporation and unlawfully converted their original Constitution into a foreign commercial corporation charter, thereby fundamentally altering the nature of the document itself without the knowledge or consent of the American states and people.
The foreign conspirators published their handiwork as "The Constitution of the United States of America" in 1868 and it appeared to be virtually identical to their original 1789 Constitution. What was hidden from view is that the very nature of the document itself had been unlawfully converted. It no longer represented a tri-lateral international treaty among sovereign states, but was instead secretively re-cast as the charter of a British commercial corporation in the business of providing "governmental services". This fundamental fraud against the actual treaty obligations and against the American states and people went undetected and misunderstood for a hundred and fifty years, but has now come to light and proves gross Breach of Trust and violation of both multiple treaties and international service contracts by the British Monarchs and the various Popes responsible for this travesty.
Don't believe it? We have absolute and fully documented proof that not a single "Amendment" to the 1868 "Constitution" has ever been properly ratified by the required number of states. The reason for this is, or should be, self-evident. As a tri-lateral international treaty the 1789 Constitution requires ratification by the states, but the look-alike, sound-alike corporate charter is just that--- a commercial corporate charter like any other, which requires only a majority vote by the Board of Directors to adopt "amendments". Whereas the actual 1789 Constitution is a public and international document, the 1868 fake is a private organizational charter. Basically, the renegade "Rump Congress" went into business for itself with the help of the British Monarch and the Pope back in 1868.
They--- the federal corporations, the British Monarchs, and the Popes--- have been splitting the profits from this gross betrayal of trust and sharing the fruits of this commercial fraud ever since. We have the proof of that, too, fully documented in the public and banking records.
Ten years later, in 1878, another travesty was allowed to occur. This one involved the similar incorporation of the Municipal (city state) government of Washington, DC. The actual Constitution allowed Congress "plenary" control of Washington, DC, so they took advantage of this fact to make Washington, DC an independent international city-state run by another commercial corporation under their own auspices. This then gave rise to the "Constitution of the United States"--- another corporate charter masquerading as a valid treaty document.
The Constitution of the United States (Municipal Government) again mirrors the actual 1789 Constitution, but in a much simplified and truncated form.
This foreign municipal "constitution" is what your purported Congressmen and Senators take their Oath of Office to. Don't believe it? Look it up on the internet. There it is in black and white --- Oath of Office --- taken to "the Constitution of the United States".
Basically, they take an oath to their own power and self-interest as plenary oligarchs in charge of the Washington, DC city-state and as the Board of Directors of the associated for-profit municipal governmental services corporation.
Whereas the federal territorial "government" is the responsibility of the British Monarchs, the municipal "government" is the responsibility of the Popes.
Both of these organizations have been grossly and criminally mismanaged in violation of our National Trust and all the venerable international treaties and commercial contracts connected to it since 1868 and 1878, respectively. Together they have run the "State of State" franchises in our actual states and the "STATE OF STATE" franchises, too. They have ruthlessly harvested the labor and natural resources of this country for fifteen decades with the help of our own employees and the Sergeant Schultz-like ignorance of our military leaders.
One can only imagine the Joint Chiefs lined up in a row stuttering, "I know NOTHING! I see NOTHING! I hear NOTHING!"
Well, hear this ---- the lawful civil government of this country gave you explicit orders over three years ago telling you what needed to be done and you still haven't done it. Now you are accepting paychecks from the Bank of France, which last time we looked, is the central bank of a foreign government. What do you propose to do? Act as foreign mercenaries against your actual employers--- the American states and people?
Saying that you "took an Oath to the Constitution" without saying which Constitution and what kind of "constitution" is like saying you "cleaned the toilet bowl" without mentioning which toilet bowl in which house.
Now the Pope has moved to liquidate the Municipal corporation as of four years ago and that has upset the whole cozy arrangement by which the USA, Inc. and its State of State franchises was being funded off of our slave labor, so both the Municipal and Territorial federal corporations are in receivership ---one in Chapter 7 and the other in Chapter 11 -- and the Bank of France (Jacob Rothschild) is providing the capital to keep the Territorial "government" running on fumes during reorganization.
Gentlemen -- there are three governments on this continent, one of which, the unincorporated United States of America, is the Paramount Security Interest Holder and Priority Creditor of every Territorial and Municipal government and every franchise of all those governments worldwide. The other two are bankrupt multi-national corporations that have nothing to do with us, other than the fact that they have been operated in gross Breach of Trust and commercial contract on our shores while you have all collected your paychecks and snored on.
One entity in this Mess is owed all the wealth and owns all the assets of virtually every incorporated entity on this planet, including the commercial banks, which are all technically bankrupt, too. And this entity just happens to be the lawful government of this country operating under the actual Constitution of this country. The other two multi-national corporations responsible for this deplorable situation are under the administration of bankruptcy Trustees named by Secondary Creditors (international banks) which are themselves in receivership to us.
Let us suggest that: (1) you probably meant to take your Oath to the actual Constitution, didn't you? and (2) to the extent that you were deceived into taking an Oath to any other foreign "constitution" by mistake, that Oath is null and void.
So,upward and onward and no excuses. This is not a matter of any dispute requiring any legal process to determine the facts. Both the British Monarch and the Pope have admitted the facts and have withdrawn from the "field of battle" over these issues. That's why the Municipal corporations are in involuntary bankruptcy and that is why the Territorial corporations are in Chapter 11. Even the central banks are not trying to argue it. They know where things stand, because it was their stated intention and past practice to claim our assets as "abandoned property".
As of 2015, we, the American states and people, operating our lawful international government, the unincorporated United States of America, re-issued our Sovereign Letters Patent, established new service contracts with different federal service providers, and in 2017, we completed our international claims process and established our private Indemnity Bond upon the United States Treasury 1789. The lawful government of this country is open for business again and ready to dispense with the quadrillions of dollars of debt (which is our credit) that have been amassed against billions of innocent people and their lawful governments.
When we speak of "re-venuing" the government, we are talking about the return of the government functions to the control of the actual land jurisdiction states and the enforcement of the actual Constitution. This needs to take place without disruption or misunderstanding. As part of this process, the former federal Paymasters need to prepare to switch over to our funding sources and the bankruptcy Trustees appointed by Secondary Creditors need to move over for the actual Priority Creditors who have presented themselves to settle the bankruptcy of both the Municipal and Territorial corporations worldwide. All those presently engaged in "law enforcement" activities need to gear up to enforce the Public Law instead.
Those of you who took an Oath to the wrong constitution by mistake are not obligated to fulfill any oath undertaken under conditions of non-disclosure and deceit. Instead, you are invited to renew your Oath to the actual Constitution and to the unincorporated United States of America. You are free to return home to the land and soil of your birth and to inherit all that is yours by nature and right.
With the True God as our Witness, what we are telling you is true and verifiable and not in dispute.
James Clinton Belcher, Head of State, United States of America (Unincorporated)
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/09/so-you-took-oath-to-defend-and-preserve.html
Talk about an eye opener. I love the fact that you also added where to find the parts that people may question. It is such a shame that the gov has been this way, basically from the very beginning. Soon as I read the part about the British, I knew you were not just blowing steam. Parts of my family Genealogy article, talked about the Brit. It is sad also, that the schools do not teach all of this as part of History. I truly enjoyed reading this, and look forward to reading your other articles. ....Resteemed and following :-)
Thanks much!!
This is an amazing read. I learned so much and feel so much better about the world. Thanks, @oneness for sharing such important information. Everyone should read this. Upvoted and resteemed.
my great pleasure friend
THANKS!!! for resteem
I hope people see it and read it.
I am doing my best to get it out there. I have promoted it and purchased 4 resteemers to get this out there!!!
love light knowledge
oneness
I am still learning.
Extremely interesting read, thank you for the share!
Thanks much, kindly if you would share this.
This is a great post! Upvoted, resteemed and followed.
Reshared @phibetaiota
And as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't have an expiration date!
Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://annavonreitz.com/soyoutookanoath.pdf
fuck you cheeta
Point to the differences in each iteration of constitution cited in this article.
Do you have permission to republish this article on Steemit? Are you the original author?
What's your point?
Do you have the capacity to do your own research ?
Here you can read everything you want from Paul's site. http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/08/the-expatriation-ad-project-for-anna.html
Then you can start reading Anna's work to your question about constitutions. http://annavonreitz.com/
Once you start that research at the bottom of those post you will have your answer about permissions.
I have been at this for 8yrs, and helped in both the advertising campaigns to get Anna's work out to all Brothers and Sisters, That is what this is ALL ABOUT!!!
AND who are you?
Well, for one, any article that makes a claim that is as obviously provocative as this should also provide proof of the allegations it presents. Assertions are, after all, not arguments. "Do your own research" is not an informative response when being asked for evidence or proof of one's claim.
Second, I asked about who you were because Steemit is ultimately a blogging platform that pays you for your work. Presenting the work of others, even if you properly attribute that work, may be cause for conflict. I'm not accusing you of plagiarizing the work, since you clearly attributed the author, but as with any other piece of published material, it is prudent, and oftentimes necessary, to request permission from the original author to republish their work.
From the beginning i have made no claims to ownership to anything.
I have given you the web sites. You are more then welcome to research out your questions, since that is what i have done for 8yrs.
By the way these are not claims, but Now undisputed facts recorded and filed across the world,as the Site will show. http://annavonreitz.com/
again who are you?
Of course they're claims. And linking me to a website that asks me to buy a book is not proof or evidence. Based on what free information I found on the page, the claims stated here are utter nonsense and demonstrate an utter lack of understanding of jurisdiction and statutory authority.
Who am I? Some guy commenting here. Unless you have some sort of credentials about studying law and legal theory, that's basically what you are, too. I can spend eight years working on making ridiculous claims without evidence, too. Doesn't mean I'm somehow an authority.
Ok, now that is your opinion, you did not search the site as you should. You narrow it down to a purchase with all that free information, over 700 articles.
You could easily have gone to this.
http://annavonreitz.com/toptenarticles.pdf
or
http://annavonreitz.com/courtfordummies.pdf
or
http://annavonreitz.com/unlawfulconversion.pdf
or
http://annavonreitz.com/twojurisdictions.pdf
And There are 3 jurisdictions, 2 have nothing to do with LIVING men and women. Statues are for the employees of the STATE and NOT the living man.
What happens when there is a un-rebutted claim in law?
It is all there for you to search out.
Unless she's filed a claim with a court of authority, her claim is irrelevant. Who'd she file her claim with?
Moreover, having read the last three articles, this is patently ridiculous. She cites a case (exceptionally improperly, by the way; for being a legal expert she apparently dispenses with the need to cite things properly) that, according to her, states that the US uses "martial common law" (whatever the hell that even is). The Supreme Court voided the last federal declaration of martial law anywhere that federal courts continued to operate following the end of the Civil War. Ex parte Milligan, 4 Wall. (71 U.S.) 12 (1866).
The only thing the cited case establishes is that there is no federal common law. Instead, it states that the federal government has no authority to suspend the jurisprudence of individual States and apply their own jurisprudence, except in cases where the Constitution specifically delegates authority to the federal government. In other words, neither Congress nor the federal courts have any "power to declare substantive rules of common law." Eerie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 78-80 (1938)
While I am a firm supporter of common law, so long as statutes comport with the common law and don't attempt to supersede it (insofar as a statute is not simply a codification of existing common law), there is no issue. Statues are for people, by the jurisdiction of whatever court they fall under. You could make the case that the Constitution is non-binding and that the decision to forbid secession is null and void, but that has no bearing whatsoever on the laws of the several States.
Then there's the whole bit about comparing the US government to Satan and drawing some comparison about Satan's place being in the ocean, therefore the US is operating under admiralty law. Unless you or her can point to some actual documentation stating this to be the case, you're outta luck.
Calling yourself a judge does not make you one. If this was a stateless society and I was choosing arbitration firms, hers would be the equivalent of the quack doctor down the street hocking healing crystals.
Buy the book....lol
What happens when there is a un-rebutted claim in law?
waiting
you say....." I can spend eight years working on making ridiculous claims without evidence, too."
Ah, but the evidence is all there for everyone, you just want an easy answer.
Do you understand what a affidavit is?
That is what her book is, every word recorded and filed....
UN-REBUTTED.
That goes from the local county court all the way to the Vatican Court. UN-REBUTTED
I and many others have done this. Not ONE rebuttal of OUR Claims.
All her documents copied and enter into her book as the last chapter.
"You Know Something Is Wrong When... An American Affidavit of Probable Cause"
yes , i am just a man WHO wants this FRAUD against We the People to END.
An affidavit is just a sworn statement. Who's going to rebut it? Who's it directed at?
Actually, I'll make it easy on you. Just point me to the case she's commenced in whatever court and I'll look it up myself. All I need is the jurisdiction she filed it in and the case name.