You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Dear Steemit. I have a problem.
i can see your point, i don't agree with it, but what exchanges did to help this, i hope they feel it. not sure is it against the low but it is unethical. and if this takeover failed or they had a bug in their HF steem on that exchanges would be locked for 13 weeks.
Yep very unethical but this guy owns one of the exchanges. You can also say the soft fork is unethical. Imagine if you paid millions for a company and they try and screw you. It has set crypto back a couple of years in credibility. You play dirty , expect a comeback and it has happened.
i understand what he did, he most probably would do this in the future when he would not be happy with witnesses.
Exchanges had nothing to gain, and if it is true they did that for profit. 2mil steem transferred to them after. so for profit they were ready to lock peoples coins for 13 weeks.
Witnesses shouldn't of soft forked if they were not happy with him in the future but they played dirty and it looks like the billionaire called in a few favours. Whether it is dirty or not the witnesses started this.
only thing that witnesses fucked up was trusting Ned. that code should be implemented when it was coded (think HF14 or 16). not trusting on founders words. contract or code. and people in the future will know, we always said steem is an experiment.
True .