You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Geoengineering In The Wake Of The Storm

CIA Director John Brennan as he addresses the Council on Foreign Relations regarding his support for geoengineering to combat "climate change".

Cloud seeding is a thing. How horrible to want to help it rain in drought stricken areas.

California Air Resource Board finds that the levels of aluminum in California's soil and water are increasing at exponential rates

Why would they report that, I thought they were in on the conspiracy

Either you are completely oblivious, a troll, or you're working for the FED.

You think THIS is a mature way to inspire a conversation? It makes you seem like a lunatic.

There isn't this massive control the weather conspiracy, there aren't fleets of plains spewing chemicals all over people.

But what about images like this! HAHA Got ya! People say. Look at that, there is no way those are normal conetrails. They are partly right, they aren't cone trails at all. They are a normal natural cloud formation (hooked cirrus).

What if you had some plane conetrails going perpendicular through a cloud formation like that? Oh god no, then it would crisscross and look like.... the same garbage that the chem trails people throw around.

you may want to form a better argument to support your claims here.

You may want to actually have a position that is supported by data, logic, reason or anything other than the irrational fear that the governments are out to get you.

Boo.

Sort:  

@justtryme90 Wrong. Brennan did NOT talk about Cloud Seeding (that technology exists since Vietnam war), but about Solar Radiation Management: which is injecting the atmosphere with aereosols (chemtrails) to obscure/reflect the Sun rays "to combat climate change".
Exactly what most "conspiracy theorists" have been denouncing for a long time (see the site Geoengineeringwatch.org for example)
It is now an officially admitted program which they obviously have tested for some time to even know it works and how much it costs and the implications.

CARB did report the aluminum findings. THIS IS DATA! Just because you can't believe that they would report it doesn't mean the report is nonexistent! Look it up!

The highest levels of government support geoengineering. FROM WHICH LOGIC AND REASONING CONCLUDE THAT AEROSOL INJECTION IS REAL. You yourself don't deny this, and maybe you can start to conclude that heavy metals in aerosol form are required to deflect the sun's rays from our atmosphere, which coincidentally are also neurotoxins that lower IQ, fertility, and alter mental status, etc.

THE IRONY IN YOUR RESPONSE IS THAT YOU HAVE PROVIDED NEITHER DATA NOR SOUND REASONING BEYOND "IT JUST DOESN'T EXIST", DESPITE CALLING ON ME TO PROVIDE IT. Where is your data? We've seen your reasoning, and well...it leaves something to be desired.

maybe you can start to conclude that heavy metals in aerosol form are required to deflect the sun's rays from our atmosphere, which coincidentally are also neurotoxins that lower IQ, fertility, and alter mental status, etc.

What the hell are you talking about?

Truly you have jumped off the deep end. Pitty.

Assumptions are all you have. Which means you are full of shit.

They aren't assumptions when they're backed by facts brother. I'm an engineer. I'm curious to know your background. I'm still waiting for your "facts, reasoning, and logic".

PhD Biochemist

I got a good laugh out of that, Thanks.

Glad to have made you happy. Have a great day.

You're being disrespectful. The information you're conveying with being disrespectful is that you don't care about the other person or that you lost some control over yourself pushing you toward some uncaring manners.

Losing control over oneself is never a good thing because one doesn't know how far this lost of self control can go and what irrational actions it will lead to.

For this reason I invite people to be more respectful of one another and try to practice self control, show compassion and care for others.

It is easy to get overly emotional at those who prefer anecdote and assumption over direct evidence.

Again, you're not saying direct evidence of what. That's the second time.

I can't agree or disagree with your evidence because for the second time you haven't said evidence of what.

Direct evidence that any of this is anything other than fearmongering nonsense.

Way people dont do some thing. If we all speak together we will have te power to stop it.

Power to stop what? Nothing here needs be stopped.