Sort:  

Personally I was criticizing one aspect of what he said only: The "slut shaming" fuck that. I imagine @peachesdoe97 isn't coerced, so I also imagine she enjoys doing this-- even would do this without getting paid to.

Folks like @anduweb might wanna try beginning their thought processes from a place of understanding-- or at least attempting to.

@anduweb - her body.

I don't know how much more unique a thing a person can contribute.

--BUT-- that's not actually the point of my "quest for porn" on steemit. Being with real people (sorry @peachesdoe97, but since you're not here, you're not "real" if that makes any sense at all) in real life is the way I like things.

THE POINT

Is entirely about censorship. In the long run steemit is going to do far, far better if it encompasses the full range of human expression-- which this post certainly falls within. Look, the fact is that censorship is the easy way out. The moral high ground, in my mind is reserved for communities that encourage respect even of topics some don't much like. Don't want to see boobs? Well, there's a whole web site for not-boobs, everything not tagged #nsfw.

...and -- where cometh porn censorship, cometh other censorship, so says Internet-Godhead-- and he's never wrong.

The point is: what value do boobs bring to steemit?
Quoting @ned, one of the steemit creators:

"On steemit, did you create something new for this comunity, did you bring some unique value that can't be found elsewhere, something that's so unique that would bring people to steemit from other places"
Source