Are Global Shapers self-organized, self-selected, and non-political? (Part 6)

in #globalism4 years ago

GSC Part 6 Feature photo.png

• Rob McLean
• September 27, 2020 1:19 am
• First published at DailyRasp.com

The Global Shapers Community (GSC) says it is self-organized, self-selected, and non-political. Is this an accurate declaration or is it rather, um, fuzzy? This is Part 6 of the series exploring the GSC, if you want some background before reading this article you will find Part 1 at DailyRasp.com.

Diverse Membership

The GSC calls itself diverse and is mandated by Charter to be so. Upon closer look, it appears that member selection comes from a rather narrow group. The group norm for the most part means attending top-level universities (not vocational colleges). That’s not a diverse group.

A scan of careers reveals a partiality for Banking, Engineering, Health, Data, and Law as favorite sectors from which to pluck comrades. There is a dearth of plumbers, carpenters, or mechanics. Again, not diverse.

Self-Organized

On the element of self-organized, established rules mean Hubs must reflect the flavor of their local community. Given this rule, Hubs can organize only to the degree that the group walks the line on PC quotas (which apparently don’t favor tradespeople).

“The World Economic Forum’s mission statement says, “We believe that progress happens by bringing together people from all walks of life who have the drive and the influence to make positive change.”

Self-selection

Regarding self-selection, it is my view that potential member-candidates be they students or young professionals are tapped to apply. This may come about by way of networking but may happen only with approval of a Hub Curator.
Therefore, it is difficult to believe that applications, while made voluntarily, are something impulsive or happen by way of happy accident.

According to the Charter, Hubs must follow directions of the Global Shapers Team in Geneva. The organizing process cannot be in practice anything other than politically correct.

Decentralized and Digitally Connected

It is fair to say the GSC is probably as decentralized as any modern organization. Decentralization is a convenience of our prosperous civilization.

Far from being a negative, decentralization just makes sense. In the age of Covid hysteria, we have discovered many functions can be fulfilled remotely, often surprisingly so. Hard to expect massive globalist organizations to be any different.

Well, there is one difference. Have you ever heard of Toplink the exclusive platform of the World Economic Forum? Members of the GSC connect through Toplink with functions similar to major social platforms. I’ll invoke George Carlin here to repeat, “It’s a club and you’re not in it!”

Non-Political

The claim to being non-political absurd. All GS activity must align with objectives of the World Economic Forum (WEF). The WEF is seeking to impose a worldwide technocratic bureaucracy.

Projects

Even a cursory look at the shaper projects and events supported by shapers reveals the repetition of the narrow focus that we see in membership. Projects are built around the standard list of progressive narratives. The same narratives echoed by Angela Merkel, the UN, and WEF. These mesh with desperate pleas for “access to education” which pivots on the manufactured outrage of gender-inequality. All of which is to open the door to funding demands for Girls in STEM (a basic search shows less results when it comes to boys in STEM versus girls) because, muh patriarchy.

Not to be left out, there are organized efforts to adjust voting behavior among “youth” and “under-represented groups.” Yes, they do cover all of the mandatory pc bases.

As a measure, I ran four searches for “global shapers” along with one of the keywords listed below.

• Climate https://archive.vn/gY3oE
• Education https://archive.vn/3JbjZ
• Gender https://archive.vn/XLWkb
• Voting https://archive.vn/DOTjn

Community, volunteer and professional activity is often connected to youth, youth education, youth and social media, youth and tech or STEM educational initiatives. Looking at campaigns and events it is obvious what is going on.

Summary

• Hub members in their day-to-day professional-social universe are a league of one-percenters.
• Campaigns aim to bring less educated, less mobile, less aware youth to manifest the UN SDGs.
• Dragging kids from school to scream in the streets that the planet is dying will elicit plenty of stories from a friendly MSM.
• Campaigns often span across regions or countries. They may use hashtags to raise awareness. For example, #ShapingTheVote and #Internet4All.

The UN is working daily to seize ever-greater power and control, seeking to welcome itself as the Global government.

The WEF is in league with the UN to create the all encompassing technocratic society of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Global Shapers must advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda. The Global Shapers Community are the army of technocrats.

Tags: globalism; technocracy; activism

Next: In Part 7 I will explore cooperation of the WHO & GSC.

To access all hyperlinks read this article at DailyRasp.com

Share and comment on social media.

Find dailyrasp on Twitter, Gab, Minds, and Parler (as RobAtDailyRasp)

© TDRmedia2020