You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Gridcoin Multi-tiered White List
How would a project move from tier to tier? Who decides where a project starts? How do we define likelihood to publish?
I think magnitude is something we need to look at, but i'm not sure if this is the way to go. Would be interested to see if anyone develops a functioning process that discourages infighting for something like this, but I don't think it'll be possible.
Tiered mag was discussed in 2015, I think. I'd suggest we focus on the current whitelist process in development and already up for a vote.
https://github.com/gridcoin-community/Gridcoin-Tasks/issues/194
I would say some type of voting mechanism could be incorporated into the client. All projects could start in tier 1, let's say, and be downvoted into lower tiers as needed. Likelihood to publish could be based on the track record of the project. An unproven project may have to stay in Tier 2 until some type of output has been achieved.
Magnitude/computational power is an interesting idea. For example, should we give more weighting towards projects with the highest magnitude?