You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Debunk-Tuesday – Tattoos will kill you
I think you made it well enough to escape my eternal wrath. ;-P
Well-written, very balanced, and as usual in my field, the risk is not really clear, but:
more research is needed.
The sentence I write at the end of every single publication of mine. Every. Single. Time.
I even have eloquent phrases to make it sound different every time, like:
Further studies should focus on the situation in vivo
or
the underlying mechanisms should be elucidated in subsequent studies
The life of a toxicologist.
The life of every scientist - how to write the same thing in 10 different ways 😎
Its an art, not everyone can master at. xD @scienceangel
That sounds more to be within the competence of politicians.
oh, if you have to describe the same method in 5 different papers, that requires some creativity to pass the plagiarism tests. Self-plagiarization is a thing, according to publishers...
This creates a small passage to confess when u miss something important on ur writing. So its a super useful thing, i guess. :D @sco bro
;-P
Especially it gives you pause to admit you didn't find the holy grail... again.
Phew. Lucky me :)
But yeah, I was actually surprised to find out these inks were not medically pure and original intended for something else. This bothers me actually, since I don't really wanna put ink into my body, which wasn't specifically created for that purpose.
Ah, the problems of non-regulation! ;-P
I heard (so this is not backed by sources^^) that the quality of inks varies a lot depending on the manufacturer, but that it's next to impossible for the custumer to keep an overview?
I knew, you were going to say that :P
And yeah, as far as I know, most customers can't really keep track on the inks used and whether they are actually decent products or not. An issue, which needs to be resolved in some way.
Oh no worry, the market solves every issue...
(not xD)