You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is the Sphinx actually 36,000 Years Old? Part II

in #history7 years ago

Most of the pushback is from academic professors with university tenure. If it turns out that it is shown to be true doesn't reflect what they have been teaching for the past 30 years then they fear losing their jobs. These guys and gals have to "die off" before a new wave of thinking and study is accepted as truth.

The same thing happened with dinosaurs, within 3 generations it was considered fact that dinosaurs did in fact exist and this opened the field up for further specialised research. Hope that helps!

Sort:  

Well, you know probably more than I do about this subject.
However, I find it very hard to believe that any "academic professor" who has all his marbles together actually believes that the great pyramids are build by the Egyptians as tombs for the Pharaohs. That is just ridiculous, even a complete moron must see that something is wrong with this theory, and still it is the doctrine. For how long now? Decades! Besides that, there was a huge vendetta against two German scientists who collected samples. The curators went absolutely berserk. Something is really fishy here in my mind...

I don't know a great deal, I want to learn as I go really, trying to piece together evidence as I go along.

This is from wikipedia:

Zahi Hawass, former Egyptian minister of state for antiquities affairs and secretary-general of the Supreme Council of Antiquities, was asked in an interview on the PBS series NOVA if it was possible that a more ancient civilization might have sculpted the Sphinx. Hawass replied: "Of course it is not possible for one reason …. No single artifact, no single inscription, or pottery, or anything has been found until now, in any place to predate the Egyptian civilization more than 5,000 years ago."

They completely ignore the fact that we have documented evidence of people constructing great works of architecture in modern day Turkey at least 12,000 years ago! See Göbekli Tepe, it amazes me that this site is still I believe 95% not excavated. Built at a time when we were supposedly hunter gatherers . This knowledge takes time to accumulate, so the knowledge of architecture etc, must come from an older still source!

This is exactly my point. These people cannot possibly be that ignorant or stupid. There is so much real evidence out there, some of the stuff is sheer mind blowing. Have you ever heard of the Austrian Klaus Dona? The things he discovered are sensational. And still, mainstream fights, denies, sabotages and ridicules everything which challenges the Dogma. This Hawass creep actually had to resign after the scandal with the Germans. Something stinks to high heaven here. In my mind, History as we are being told is a lie. Not because of personal arrogance, vanity or greed. There must be more behind it...