It appears as if the hatred for a specific individual has been put on display here in this post. This shines a bright light on what might actually be happening here. It seems as if, since a specific individual might be the owner of all these accounts, some other personalities feel it is fine to freeze a specific individual's funds, for reasons only known to these personalities, but this appears is if the reason is something like those personalities simply don't like one specific individual. They've exposed their intention and their target for this harassment, in a sense. It could not have been a coincidence some of those accounts were seized before this post was published highlighting who may be who. It's clear now they were targeting one specific individual since some of those accounts highlighted here were on the list of accounts affected by version 22.8888. Even if it is not one specific individual who owns these accounts, they've proven they were under the impression it was one specific individual, long before publishing this.

This is like freezing the accounts of Bill Gates because you do not like Windows, in many ways, and that would be an absurdity that defies logic, which would explain why so many people of sound mind do not approve nor understand why this all occurred.

This was not a community based decision and I feel it is unfortunate those behind this act of possible revenge have now forced many more stakeholders to lose confidence. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. If they're freezing these funds to prevent a specific individual from dumping an investment they're no longer interested in, they've now given thousands more stakeholders an actual reason to dump, and the value of those tokens would exceed those of the specific individual being held against their will.