Steemit Crypto Academy Contest / S19W4 [SUMMARY]: Mastering the Sharkfin Model for Trading

Hello Steemians,

Welcome to the weekly edition of our competition, organized by the Steemit Crypto Academy as part of the Steemit Engagement Challenge (SEC) Season 19. For this fourth week, from July 29 to August 4, 2024, we explored an exciting and relevant theme: Mastering the Sharkfin Model for Trading.

This topic allowed us to delve into the various opportunities and challenges presented by the Sharkfin Model, a crucial aspect for making informed trading decisions and maximizing profits in the cryptocurrency market. Understanding these concepts helps traders navigate the market effectively.

During this week, our participants showed exceptional engagement and in-depth analysis in their contributions. Through various articles, discussions, and case studies, they explored the intricacies of the Sharkfin Model and shared valuable insights.

This report presents a roundup of the best submissions, innovative ideas, and insightful analyses shared by our talented members. It also highlights the importance of understanding these concepts to navigate the complex and ever-changing cryptocurrency markets.

---

Participation statistics

During this week, we received a total of 11 entries. Out of these, 7 entries were valid and 4 were invalid due to various reasons:

Total number of entries	Invalid entries	Plagiarized content	Non-respect of club status	Irrelevant content
11	4	1	2	1

We are particularly satisfied with the quality of the valid contributions.

---

_{Entries Breakdown}

_{Content Quality Distribution}

---

The distribution of content quality among the entries is quite revealing, providing a detailed picture of the participants' understanding and adherence to the competition guidelines.

Firstly, 37% of the entries were rated as excellent. This indicates that these participants showcased a profound understanding and comprehensive analysis of the Sharkfin Model. Their submissions stood out due to their insightful observations and thorough exploration of the topic, demonstrating a high level of expertise and engagement.

Next, 27% of the entries were rated as good. These submissions, while not reaching the same depth as the excellent ones, still exhibited a solid grasp of the subject matter. Participants provided meaningful insights and analysis, reflecting a strong command of the topic and contributing valuable perspectives to the discussion.

Interestingly, none of the entries fell into the acceptable or below-average categories, with both ratings at 0%. This suggests that participants either produced high-quality work or their entries were disqualified, indicating a polarizing distribution where only the best submissions were considered valid.

However, 27% of the entries were deemed invalid. These entries were disqualified due to non-compliance with the competition rules, such as failing to meet club status requirements or being irrelevant to the topic. This highlights the necessity for participants to adhere strictly to the guidelines to ensure their contributions are considered.

Lastly, 9% of the entries contained plagiarized content. This is a significant issue as it undermines the integrity of the competition. It underscores the importance of ongoing efforts to detect and prevent plagiarism to maintain the quality and credibility of our contests. Ensuring originality and authenticity in submissions is crucial for fostering a trustworthy and valuable learning environment.

---

Top 3 users this week

In our evaluation process, we first assessed the quality of participants' performances, focusing on their interactions with other competitors.

To choose the top three participants, we took into account their performance scores and how they interacted with others. Additionally, we have made a special selection based on an outstanding article that provided exceptional content on the topic of discussion. Here are the three participants we recognized this week:

Ranking	Username	Article
1	@simonnwigwe	Mastering the Sharkfin Model for Trading
2	@aneukpineung78	Mastering the Sharkfin Model for Trading
3	@rafk	Mastering the Sharkfin Model for Trading

---

Conclusion

We are extremely pleased with the participation and quality of submissions this week. Despite the relatively low number of entries, the overall trend is positive, and we look forward to seeing even more participants join our future competitions.

These findings highlight the importance of continually encouraging original, well-thought-out contributions while avoiding plagiarism and misuse of AI-generated content. Together, we are building a stronger, more informed community, ready to meet financial market challenges with insight and confidence.

We thank all participants for their outstanding contributions and look forward to future editions of our competitions, where we will continue to explore relevant and enriching themes.