You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Ichimoku Kinko Hyo

in SteemitCryptoAcademy • 3 years ago

Hello @alphafx,
Thank you for participating in the 5th Week Crypto Course in its third season and for your efforts to complete the suggested tasks, you deserve a 5.5/10 rating, according to the following scale:

OriginalityCompliance with topicConsistency of methodQuality of analysisClarity of structure & language
(0.5/2)
(1.5/2)
(1/2)
(0.5/2)
(2/2)

My review :

An article with average content that contained answers to some questions that lacked depth in the analysis, and I will justify some of the observations for you:

  • Your interpretation of the cloud and its lines was brief and lacked some depth in the analysis.

  • You did not delve into the analysis of the relationship between price action momentum and the Ichimoku cloud, especially using the Kumo Thickness. As well as to determine the levels of support and resistance that differ from the traditional method.

  • Your interpretation of the twist and how to use it when trading is missing some depth in the analysis.

  • The fourth question guarantees correct information but lacking deepening the analysis of the answers.

Thanks again for your effort, and we look forward to reading your next work.
Sincerely,@kouba01

3 years ago in SteemitCryptoAcademy by
$2.58
  • Past Payouts $2.58
  • - Author $1.29
  • - Curators $1.29
2 votes
Reply 3
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     3 years ago 

    Thank you for your review.
    For improvement purposes
    What is criteria are to be fulfilled under the parameter “originality”?

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       3 years ago 
      • Is the issue relevant to the objectives of the review?
      • Does the article contribute new content or meaningful critical analysis?
      • Does the way of approaching the subject and of analyzing it contributes to the advancement of knowledge?
      • Is the theme or topic the subject of an adequate argument?
      $0.00
        Reply