You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 💥 Booming Upvote Information - February

You know something, I just saw the update the post, by communities, most prefer to support the community account with this resource, and I have also seen that sc01 and sc02 were or are supporting some community accounts frequently. No wonder some users get sad, frustrated, power down and leave.

Sort:  

Saludos @saracampero siempre tan asertiva en este comentario.🤗🥰

On the plus side, this list highlights the communities that do this - not just to the community account, but to the admin who is also entitled to 2 votes per week on top of the 3-4 community votes.

Their members seeing this will decide to leave these communities and move to those which support their users and not themselves.

The selfish communities will lose their members, reducing the justification for them to receive booming support (although the fake accounts will continue to bloat the numbers).

If you go deeper, you will surely find that maybe some community accounts give more than 14 votes a week to some moderator or administrator, taking advantage of the resources gathered by the users' delegations.

As well as the cross-voting - where the community accounts upvote each other.

Yes, a community can be a micro business if it knows how to manage it, being positive when it is honest.

For example now, you can take advantage of these.

  • % of the profit in the posts.
  • Cross-votes, with the resources of the delegators.
  • Booming votes for the community account and administrators.
  • SC01 or sc02 votes.

In addition, community accounts now have rewards:

  • Per curation.
  • Per % beneficiary.
  • Per author (sc01 or sc02, booming, and cross votes with other community accounts).

This is not all bad, besides, it contributes to the growth, but the question is that if they abuse this...

Otra vez toda la razón. 😘🥰