You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Resultados SEC-S16-W5 | Espacios naturales
Hubo muchas publicaciones y muy buenas. Elegir no es fácil. Puedes visitar también a @ dove11 solo por mencionar a otro usuario que hizo una publicación excelente pero estos son los ganadores.
No es fácil pero somos objetivos para seleccionar.
Saludos fraternos!
Las decisiones del jurado, en las que no premian la calidad excepcional de, en este caso @xaviduran, @dove11 o @stef1 nos llevan también a los steemers a hacer una reflexión. ¿Vale la pena dedicar horas a hacer una entrada de calidad? Nos hace plantearnos delegar a un Bot y obtener un porcentaje de la delegación, subiendo cada día un dibujo mal hecho.
La plataforma en este aspecto funciona mal, no es responsabilidad exclusivamente vuestra, pero decisiones como esta hacen que siga funcionando mal.
No estamos siendo duros, simplemente exponemos una realidad.
Saludos igualmente fraternos.
Hi Silvia, thank you for drawing my attention to this post, I can understand your feeling and your reaction. I share your opinion that often users get disappointed after preparing their works spending really couple of hours and sharing their unique works like in case of Xavi exclusively on Steemit and often it is not receiving the attention and appreciation that it deserves. This is how it is on Steemit, Moderators and Curators making their decision of their personal like and dislike scale and this is something we can not force anyone.
I agree that often some users get frustrated and delegate their Steem Power to Bots knowing that there they receive a certain return from their investment or to pay Upvote service to get an upvote like Roy is doing by paying @upmewhale
We all make some decisions what we do, there is no right advise, but I hope that you still will have a motivation to continue taking part in such activities and communication and hopefully, will be visited more often by Curation accounts.
Best wishes, Stef