Very well pointed out! Thank you very much!

I only hesitate to agree on your first point, the choking of data while being captured in a pollution loop. The ingestion of data from the internet has not necessarily to be unvalued. It could be focussed stronger on digitalized literature from scientifical publications (in the broadest sense) than on everyone's writings. But if so, your second point will get still more weight. And in the end, we will have to de-hype the recent furor.

On the other hand, using the so called AIs more and more could gain income by implementing services one has to pay for. This could result in an ongoing development despite the fact there is not much more to improve.

The bias of AI-driven information in regard to sources with fake information plus the impact of censorship will surely get the most important facts to discuss and to observe.