SUMMARY REPORT: "SEC | S20W4: "ROLE OF AGRICULTURE IN THE ECONOMY"

in Steem-Agrolast month (edited)

Hello Agro participants,

Welcome to the weekly summary of our competition, organized by Team-Agro as part of the ongoing Steemit Engagement Challenge (SEC) season 20. For this fourt week's report, from September 30th to 6th October, 2024, we hosted an exciting topic for the week under review, the theme "The role of Agriculture in the economy".

1000237740.jpgdesigned in canva

The week's topic gave us more insights and the opportunity to look into some of the most important concerns about agricultural roles in the economy. Emphasis on social and industrial roles have us some vital views on how much our economies have been stimulated through agricultural activities and impact on human livelihoods. A proper understanding of thiese roles would help improve both human, socio-economic and environmental challenges.

However, during the week's engagement, students showed extremely applaudable entries with detailed analysis of all task questions. During reviews, there was several practical knowledge shared as they explored the impacts of agricultural roles and impacts on the economy. Many insights received were commendable while.

This summary report represents an analysis of all submissions made while capturing the real and hands-on agro-initiatives of different students. It also brings a clearer understanding of all mentioned agricultural roles in the economy, and I urge us to also find time to go through the links posted in the comment section for more insights. Every entry posted came with its own knowledge and shared details.

List of Participants

1000237698.jpg


Entry Statistics

For week four entries, we received a total of 42 valid entries, with all demonstrating an applaudable level of compliance bearing in mind the rules and guidelines. The outcomes were deserving of all these valid entries recorded having satisfied the need to handle tasks given. However, we had two cases guidelines abuse after found with high percentage of AI contents.

Valid EntriesInvalid EntriesAI/Plagiarized ContentTotal Entries Captured
400242

1000237677.jpg


Country Participation Indices

In total, we had a pull of 8 countries that participated in the week's four teaching challenge. Pakistan, Nigeria and Venezuela happen to represent top three countries of the entire entries captured.

1000237684.jpg


Entry Performance

A good number of entries captured for the week under review made excellent and good entries. While 50% were categorized under excellent entries, 45.2% were rated as good quality. These two major and acceptable score qualities had a combined performance of 95.2%, which demonstrates the student's in-depth understanding and hands-on knowledge regarding the topic "the role of agriculture in the economy."

1000237691.jpg

However, we have a 4. 8% rating for poor quality distribution, which is quite infinitesimal to the total entries reviewed. A case where these entries where flagged for use of AI materials This does not remove the fact that there were other warnings recorded during the review. We hope those affected stay clear from further infractions, no matter how insignificant, as they are already watched. Hence, this also played a role in our decision while making our top five (5) selections for the week.

While we continue in the season's teaching challenge, we must continue on the path of making original and course-related contributions that are both beneficial to all, bearing in mind the need to adhere accordingly to the rules guiding our participation.

Top Users This Week

After a keen evaluation process, we accessed the student's quality entry as a major determinant in the selection process while strongly taking into cognizance their adherence to all stipulated rules as required.

In addition, there were students with slight warnings or no warnings due to little fragment traces of AI. They may be insignificant, but they also matter to us, but this would not be given a pass for a reward presentation. Subsequently, a review to completely flag such publications would be made as the may be in future contests.

We have made our selection based on outstanding articles that provided quality content on the topic of discussion. Here are the five participants we recognized for this week:

RankingUsernamesArticle
1@patjewelllink
2@ninapendalink
3@fajrularifstlink
4@anasuleidylink
5@ashkhanlink
Conclusion

We are glad with the participation and percentage of quality content seen for the week. It was a nice turnout, having 42 participants with 95% genuinely responding with quality publications. We look forward to a larger participation in our next week challenge.

We will want to thank all participants for their quality contributions while we encourage students to stay away from plagiarism, word spinning, and the use of AI.

Regards,
@xkool24
For Team-Agro

Cc: @mainuna


Vote @pennsif.witness for growth across the Steemit platform through robust communication at all levels and targeted high-yield developments with the resources available.
Sort:  

Wow that's a great surprise for me. Thank you so much that your my post in top quality content and selected as a winner. Congratulations to @patjewell, @ninapenda, @fajrularifst, @anasuleidy.

Congratulations to you too @askhan,

But do you know why our gifts haven't arrived yet? 😊

Thank you! 🎕

Wow, I'm really surprised by this result, being nominated among the great users is an honor for me.

Thanks for this great honor from Team-Agro 🙏🏼

I can see two other winners have the same score as mine 9.2. Don't you think I should have been a joint winner with them?
@steemcurator01
@steemcurator02

No! I do not think so. It is perogative on us to make top5 participants as winners, and this was simply demostrated without ambiguity. I would have had a rethink if those mentioned had scored lower marks than you expressed.

Or are you insinuating that all those with 9.2 score should be listed as winners irrespective how many they are?

I beg your pardon. I do not expect this line of thought. Other quality posts and participants with good grades also matter. It shouldn't have been you before it is ideal.

Regards...

Other quality posts and participants with good grades also matter. It shouldn't have been you before it is ideal.

If the scores are similar nothing else matters since you have accepted the quality is equal. I have faced this in my contest so let SC01 and 02 take the decision.

 last month 

Wow, thank you so much TEAM-AGRO for nominating my post. I appreciate 🙏

Wow A million thanks for rating my post... I am very happy and surprised!!!

 last month 

Congratulations to all of you.

I can also say... wow!! Thank you!
Being amongst the winners is appreciated.
Well done to all 40 Steemians who entered, and congratulations to the winners.
There were some excellent posts.

 last month 

welcome ma,am ❤️🤗