RE: Who wants to start a blogging team?
So... good idea? bad idea? worth experimenting? What are your thoughts?
I think it's worthwhile to think about ways to do things that will make the ecosystem actually work for people. The chain was set up around the model of a high-traffic discussion site like Reddit. Even if the parameters related to number and size of votes would make sense for a site like that (not really clear to me one way or the other) that's not the environment we're operating in. Personally I don't think I'd be likely to want to be part of a blogging team, I'm skeptical I could find enough people here with sufficiently shared interests and a high enough level of trust to make it work (especially since there's still a big guilt-by-association streak with the way people interact on the internet nowadays -- sometimes it feels like you need to be careful not to step anywhere that might end up being a retroactive landmine).
Yeah, the chain is definitely not being used the way it was imagined in the whitepaper. I think that ship has sailed. Now, we just have to find the most effective ways to use the tools we have.
@o1eh raised this point too. It's definitely a real challenge. Heck, forgetting about common interests, just getting people who blog in a common language is a challenge right now. I get that there are translation tools, but I think most readers probably don't want to go through that hassle.
This is a good point that I hadn't thought about. Of course, it's possible for someone to set up an alt account and contribute pseudonymously, but there's no such thing as perfect anonymity, so that's a real concern in many quarters.
TEAM 1
Congratulations! This comment has been upvoted through steemcurator04. We support quality posts , good comments anywhere and any tags. TEAM 1
Congratulations! This comment has been upvoted through steemcurator04. We support quality posts , good comments anywhere and any tags.