You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Yes 👍 or No 👎???

in Steem Oasis 🌴 • last month (edited)

Not sure, from just a "raw data" perspective, but if done through the lens of vetting the actual teams using SC03-09, it might be useful.... but that sort of defeats the purpose of having it, and it's no longer simple.

That said, with a potential altcoin bull run simmering in the early stages, having some kind of quality control cross reference will be a useful tool, as the "horde" is sure to show up if Steem gets back to $0.50-$1.00 or more.

Edited to add: I'd rather see something like a ratio of upvotes to actual page views as a measure of how many people actually READ a given piece of content.

last month in Steem Oasis 🌴 by
$0.12
  • Past Payouts $0.12
  • - Author $0.06
  • - Curators $0.06
4 votes
Reply 2
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     last month 

    Edited to add: I'd rather see something like a ratio of upvotes to actual page views as a measure of how many people actually READ a given piece of content

    👍 der Gedanke gefällt mir auch !
    VgA

    $0.03
    • Past Payouts $0.03
    • - Author $0.02
    • - Curators $0.02
    2 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     last month 

    I'd rather see something like a ratio of upvotes to actual page views as a measure of how many people actually READ a given piece of content.

    Unfortunately, I'm not aware of any way to get page views - especially given the possibility for views through multiple front-ends. Your suggestion made me think that I could get payout per feed placement, though (based upon the "feed-reach" number, above). Not as good a payout per view, but maybe a step in the right direction. I might add that metric. Thanks for the feedback!

    $0.00
      Reply