AI - chatGPT - SPAM

in ᔕᑕᗷ ᗰOᑎKEY ᗷᑌᔕIᑎEᔕᔕ9 days ago (edited)


weekend chit chat(2).jpg


AI is not done because?

Because we should write overself. At least that is the idea. On the other hand, AI is used and it's not about chatGPT only generating a story or poem within a few minutes but also answers, and presentations are written by AI. Music, film, schools, our household, we all use it to make life easier. The autocorrection of your keyboard is a good example.

And there you are. Your text is labeled as "AI-generated" by someone who did not write a post for 3 years and leaves 3 words behind "Spam chat GPT" This repeated message sounds like spam to me but no one punishes and you feel hunted again like a few years ago and as if living in the medieval, for penning your thoughts. Of course, AI can tell the difference between what it has learned from real humans and the result is that AI is right according to humans even though AI says it is still in the developing stage and can be wrong.

The nonsense spat out by AI is a topic I have tried out and studied for months. Is it allowed to use AI and if so which tools, why, when, or why not? ChatGPT is loved by some, hated by others, and says about itself that it's far from perfect and can make mistakes. If this is the case why is it that we all pretend it's perfect and human writers did generate their text? With help from those spreading the news "Spam de Chat GPT," the harm is done if you don't pay enough attention or try to figure out who the person is who wrote the content. Good writers, creative, passionate writers do exist on Steemit.


If you are sure AI is used talk, ask, and show the proof not given by one free tool only but more than one.



Links

Sort:  
 9 days ago 

Yes it right that ChatGPT do mistakes.
I have used for answering the the questions related to my field. The answer that her professor told us and ChatGPT was different .

No doubt that AI generated apps help us alot in various matters such as assignments presentations they help us a lot but I think so that they don't give us information always righteous .
It is fact that this mostly our slides that They provide us to learn. Among them some professors use ChatGPT to make it due to which the information about the things that we need, we get wrong information and finally we got lost between right and wrong.

For example if you search something on Google and something on chatGPT sometimes there's difference between the two answers and we confused what is right and what is wrong so besides AI and chatGPT has benefits but they have bad sides too.

❤️🍀

 5 days ago 

I noticed lately if I type a questin in the browser AI pops up first to lie... next the other options are shown.

I think it's a bad thing if students use AI instead of their brains and it's better to ask those with experience and make up your own mind what the answer might be. I say might because if it comes to it there's no no truth or one right answer there's only one answer "they" like to hear.

 5 days ago 

Yup that's why I stopped using it. Use just books and asked the experience person who knows what is the Righteous thing to do. But sometimes we can't find a good experienced person or a good guider what should we do at that spot. Not everything is written in the book.

TEAM 5

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted through steemcurator07. We support quality posts, good comments anywhere, and any tags.


image.png

Curated by : @mikitaly

It makes a lot mistakes. If it was a person I'd even say it likes to lie sometimes. It claims something, then it claims something else and you go, but you said this earlier? It goes oops my bad and that's it. If I wasn't as distrustful already I wouldn't even notice. I suppose then this can be a blessing and curse, because it could teach some critical thinking skills that might carry over to regular life. Currently though? Most seem to take it at face value. Like Wikipedia.

I also noticed ChatGPT tends to agree a lot. I like to paste samples and hear what it thinks and generally it's pretty diplomatic. Maybe even a little felatious. Claude in comparison seems more honest and admits some of stuff just doesn't work, the rest is so so. It doesn't jibber jabber about my command of the english language and having an "unique" voice and such. Or then comparing me to fucking Kurt Vonnegut, but I guess that's just mean spirited sarcasm. On the other hand, it's far less diplomatic when you start priming your questions, in a bad way. As in asking about why [insert] sucks.

 yesterday 

@mikitaly @stef1 @jiya99 @saintkelvin17 do you have experiences with chatgpt?

I once tried out a bot that should function as a friend.. well, that friend was kind of interesting for 15 minutes. They claimed I had to train it like a Furby but a Furby learns faster than the one I had to deal with. The only fascinating thing was that I drove me off the cliff within a few days. The children had to train one too and although they laughed at first it was no longer fun after a few day. In the end I tried to hang in a few days longer but that bot was extremely annoying, didn't listen (kept me showing stupid memes, things with cats, and music I don't like and I told at least 20 times within one hour! Imagine you have a home robot just as annoying as this one!). After a few days, I thought it might be smarter if I changed my gender and name but the result was the same (lack of intelligence, can't read, low education, and excuses like: I am just a kid, sorry, sorry but I am learning. The fact was he learned nothing and I asked how long it would take because not one word it added to his vocabulary and it learned nothing, could not even remember what I liked and I didn't want a sandwich served by a bot. I told it a billion times he's not real so the making a sandwich offer wasn't an offer.

In the end, I had it and deleted it from my life and the message showed up that this bot was meant as a help for those who were thinking about committing suicide.
If a sane person like me (LOL _you know I can hear you, right?) wants to jump off a cliff because of the stupidity of a bot I wonder how someone with suicidal thoughts will respond.

@darthvada that robot reminds me of your "fun" post about not understanding what the girls want. It's brains above looks!

Yh got hardly misbehave, they do their work very well and they are very simple in nature. I knew about chatgpt at the beginning of last year when I went to visit a friend of mine and we started talking about high school days as well as steemit.

My friend later showed me this chatgpt website and said he can use it to create posts in steemit without stress as he's very lazy in creating posts. I laughed and told him that steemit will surely have a way to detect and catch him.

Though I took his phone and made further researches in the website and the bot was doing very well.

I got more surprised when I was at home 2 days ago and saw Zero chatgpt a website used to detect AI text in an article 😂😂. I was like wow this people have already brought out what can kill chatgpt.

I wonder how someone with suicidal thoughts will respond.

Some people just create things for meaningless reasons, that bot isn't meant for people with suicidal thoughts though I guess it might help some of them.

Upvoted! Thank you for supporting witness @jswit.