Hi, friend! We haven't had an AI debate for a long time ;-))

Yes, I'm happy to repeat my pleas: trust your reading instincts. Compare authors' texts with their other statements. Are they stringent?

There are a few references in texts that are actually clear evidence that an AI was at work: Beginnings like: "In the picturesque hills surrounding a dreamy little village a bright boy named Eric / Max / Tom /... grew up." "It's always important to note that there can also be negative influences when you..." "Everyone admired him for his wisdom and strength."

The AI makes some bold assumptions based on the processing of accessible social media data: People want to dream, people tend to think in black and white, and people like to admire and be admired. Well...

Unfortunately, that's the rubbish that AI gets to eat. So what do we expect it to spit out?

Worst of all, some of our writers are starting to model their writing style on that of the AI. Maybe it's better than their own. Who knows...

I sound nasty, I know. The fact is that the purely technical differentiation has never been possible beyond doubt and is becoming increasingly uncertain due to these effects. So: leave it alone!