You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Writing course / Curso de escritura #wewrite - L2
I think the problem is that they are generating 3 tasks in different publications, that is, they are tripling the normal participation.
Sorry for the intrusion, but it seems better to me that the 3 tasks are developed in a single publication, this way they can be covered by 2 or 3 people.
One task is not enough to try out something new. If there would have been only the first the results would have been terrible and many wouldn't have learned anything.
After the second task, the results changed and a great improvement was shown and with task 3 a contest not many join it increased again.
Would one task have made it easier for us? I doubt it since Saturday people still joined in and started with task 1.
Why different communities?
Because there are plenty and discovering some other communities than we are used to write, to discover something new seeing what is posted there) will broaden the horizon of a writer, and willhopefully also improve engagement.
we-write it's not about dropping a post 2 minutes before the deadline but about achieving something together and the chance to improve, ask, try and edit.
Ps. @inspiracion and I did all entries together but the fact remains that every 150+ entry deserves to be read, qyestions should be answered, a task might need more explanation and this takes time too. It's about we not I and knowing that for a change you will be read.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts it's highly appreciated.
.
Agreed.