I read all ideas until now. While developing projects to increase the value of Steem, the added value that Steemit's authors who produce quality content in the ecosystem should not be ignored. We do not want decreased interest in Steemit as a result of the ideas that are excitedly put forward to attract attention. Therefore, they must be evaluated in a multi-directional way.

I would like to share my humble opinion by adapting the Three Laws of Robotics of "I, Robot" by Isaac Asimov, one of the masters of science fiction, to our situation: "Three Laws of Steemit"

1. Projects may not harm Steemians who produce quality content or, through inaction, allow them to leave the platform.

2. Projects must be voiced by Steemians who are creative and have ideas that will add value to Steem, as long as they do not conflict with the First rule.

3. Projects must maintain and increase the value of Steem as long as they do not conflict with the First or Second rule.