Well, then, if this does not harm our friend, I will start writing the next post.

Situations are different, but here I see only misunderstanding and balancing of the use of AI for both the watchful and the rich. This needs to be looked at from different sides and one cannot ignore the moment of some kind of justice that the witnesses rely on.

But, I repeat, justice must be clarified in a dialogue, which, as I understand, has not yet happened.

When I have an idea, the result of which I cannot predict, then, it seems to me, it is necessary to find out the consent of those who may not like it, this is the very case.

I hope that I have not tired anyone with my thoughts lol, I believe that a consensus will be found in this matter.