You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why don't we comment on other people's posts more often?

in WORLD OF XPILAR2 years ago

In my understanding, a post without comments is an unsuccessful post. If everything is said and there is nothing to talk about, then the problem or thought raised in the submitted post is not relevant. Discussion, comments - that's what makes life on any social platform. Opinions, ideas, reflection of different life views and positions, exchange of life experience, all this gives impetus to knowledge and development. High-quality content is, first of all, interesting people who have something to say, from whom you can learn something. The main interest in the crypto platform is the source of financial income. To achieve this immediately from the very beginning of work on the platform is almost impossible. It takes time, it takes work, it takes the creation of a circle of members of the platform who are interested in your work and in you. It is not easy and long. Good authors with quality content cannot wait half a year, a year, they want to eat today and now, and they leave after the first posts. Therefore, comments are at least some chance to cling to the platform, having received a vote from wealthy old-timers. The platform requires constant changes and experiments in the implementation of creativity, including a careful approach to comments.

Sort:  
 2 years ago 

Thanks for the great feedback @gor671

In a period I have had a competition to reward good posts to the author and also reward those who nominate the post
"Nominate and get Rewarded: 15% Trial Upvote, (Nomination Day 125)"
As you can see, I have had that competition 125 times now, but the interest is low and there are often only a few who nominate an author. It's strange that more people don't want to nominate writers when they can also win a reward for doing so.

I will consider whether I will continue with that competition or maybe change it in the future