You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: How To Get People Interested in STEEM?

in WORLD OF XPILAR2 years ago

The work you put in is remarkable! However, I am still not sure if it makes sense to attract more and more authors here. The quality of the books on offer, for example, certainly doesn't improve as the number of writers increases. If you attract investors, this has a direct input on the market value of the steem. Authors who want to and can write will find their way here on their own ;-)) But as I said: I am open to surprises ;-))

Die Arbeit, die Ihr investiert, ist bemerkenswert! Ich bin allerdings immer noch nicht sicher, ob es so sinnvoll ist, immer mehr Autoren hierher zu locken. Die Qualität z.B. des Buchangebotes wird sicher nicht besser mit steigender Anzahl der Schriftsteller. Wenn Du Investoren anwirbst, hat das direkten Input auf den Marktwert des Steem. Autoren, die schreiben wollen und können, finden alleine hierher ;-)) Aber wie gesagt: ich bin offen für Überraschungen ;-))

Sort:  
 2 years ago 

I was of the same opinion. If we talk about the authors, then you may be right. But if we talk about the success of the project as a whole, the situation is a bit different here.

I would be very naive to expect investors to invest in STEEM just because they saw an Instagram post. But if we talk about social networks, then they are attractive only when they are popular. If we talk about cryptocurrencies, then they are also attractive only when they are popular and have a large community behind them. It turns out that we doubly need to popularize STEEM/Steemit.

Popularity also has negative consequences. They cannot be avoided. Here will come those who want to earn without making any effort, here will come scammers and plagiarists, here will come beggars. But among them, I hope, there will be new wonderful authors.

It seems to me that if we do not popularize STEEM, then over time due to the natural outflow of authors, only a handful of users will remain here. The platform will become less social, less interesting and unnecessary.

I see your point. However, I can't get my head around the idea that something should be unnecessary if it is not used by the whole world... I really think it would be more interesting and worthwhile if a platform for enthusiastic authors and networkers were to be established. Apart from that, I would also like to see a stomping ground for investors. But... Separate.

Ich sehe Deinen Standpunkt. Allerdings will mir nicht in den Kopf, daß etwas unnötig sein soll, wenn es nicht von aller Welt genutzt wird... Ich fände es wirklich interessanter und lohnenswerter, wenn sich eine Plattform für begeisterte Autoren und Netzwerker etabliert. Abseits davon gerne zusätzlich ein Tummelplatz für Investoren. Aber... Getrennt.

 2 years ago 

When I wrote the word "unnecessary", I meant that authors leave Steemit for various personal reasons. This is a natural process. It may happen that no one will read our posts. Then who wants to write?

I completely understand your point. Quantity always reduces quality. I myself doubt whether I am on the right path.

I don't want to make it more difficult to you! But... Nowadays, it seems to be fashionable to declare exactly one way as good and right and then not allow any further reflection. I notice a touch of that here on the Steem as well....