You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: WARNING: Be cautious when creating new communities
I had some disputes with him in the past, but they revolved around very different points of view and opinions. Normal, that is. Apart from that, I thought he was committed and trustworthy. Until a few weeks ago, when he was called out for various things - when Steem Rep only had four or six comments a week and they were mainly in the form of smilies... Looked at the account and realised that he was, shall we say, overrated. That there are so many more unpleasant things to report surprises and disappoints me...
I think the user has great experience of how Steemit works and how to make it work for yourself. It is sad that he gained trust of many through his attitude of asking for support. Sad.
... and then I see great writers who engage, who interact - and who really have something to say. Unfortunately, some of them don't get much attention/support at the moment because they don't fulfil any club conditions and may have to live off their modest income here. As an example, I would like to mention @mercurysys, who is a wonderful enrichment in Dream Steem. Of course there are many more...
I noticed @mercurysys, very good blog and images that is what attracted me. The problem is the user withdrawing and there is no Power Up, unfortunately.
Also, it is difficult to know the ownership of images, if own then would be good to have Website address or for example social media where person shows them up. Also there is no country. I believe all the combination makes Curators to skip this user, which is a shame.
I also agree there are many more users who are not seen..
Yes, I understand your explanation. Nevertheless, it is sad. I don't have a country listed on my account either - I just write openly about the fact that I'm based in Germany. Like mercurysys about being from Venezuela ;-)) What he does there, at which events he appears... I don't use other Social Media as well... He takes steem for his living - because it is existential. That's what I do too, by the way ;-)) For me it is not quite so existential, I pay attention to the club5050 condition and power up: because I find it important and right. In support - and this time I explicitly mean high votes ;-)) - I have not been lacking from the beginning... What remains is the stale feeling that double standards are being applied and that someone who is clearly worse off than the curators themselves is being kept down additionally.
I know you try a lot and stand up for a lot of people: I definitely don't mean you personally! More so the curation system as a whole. So thank you for listening and understanding ;-))