RE: 0000000000000111 - Proposal to Change Focus
As a community admin and also a mod I think it’s a good idea to fight plagiarism. But I think it’s hold be one at a time 😍. I will prefer that your priories the reskin as to the plagiarism checker as many other users have taken up the responsibility in fighting plagiarism.
Does this mean that for a user who is constantly buying votes and also plagiarising, his votes will be downvoted instantly? Will the new mechanism be able to show to other users the names of other steemians who have submitted a post for scrutiny?
Most definitely I will be interested in playing the game but I think if it is fun and rewarding too many users will want to participate in it.
And because it’s a bit checking will there be a second party check to make sure that the bit is not mistaken?( As you know technology cannot be always trusted as we have seen with other checkers)
The idea is that the community decides what posts should be submitted into the game so it could be plagiarism, spam, bot abuse or anything really. The person who submits "the case" is stored in a database but never presented to the interface so anybody wanting vengeance won't know where to look (hence the challenge with paying rewards).
The idea that the players of "the game" decide whether something is abuse or not is the human element checking that the technology is working - along with the daily report which gets posted with the "strongest" abuse cases.
The downvotes could be linked to the result of each "game" but I think I'd prefer that to be handled elsewhere - e.g. the report could link to the abusive post and allow for the group downvoting.