Content review is important to validate that users are respecting the platform's content policies. Plagiarism, repeated content, among others, are practices defined as abuse, and therefore, are not allowed.

The Steem Watcher team, interested in the well-being of Steemit, has committed (through detectives) to identify and report all cases of abuse.

_Pixabay

Below I share the cases that were detected and validated as abuse, some accounts related to the case reported in my recent report, while others, related to accounts that have been receiving juicy rewards, from repeated content.

No.	Post Link	Source	Abuser ID	Abuse Type
1	Link	Link	@azammalik	Reward Farming
2	Link	Link	@adeebkhan	Reward Farming
3	Link	Link	@abbas786	Reward Farming
4	Link	Link	@zahirameer	Repeat Content
5	Link	Link	@usman-ali	Repeat Content
6	Link	Link	@lovepk	Repeat Content
7	Link	Link	@tahir422	Repeat Content
8	Link	Link	@noziking	Repeat Content
9	Link	Link	@nnnniazi	Repeat Content
10	Link	Link	@nasirhusian	Repeat Content
11	Link	Link	@uco.bnb-l	Repeat Content
12	Link	Link	@uco.intern	Repeat Content
13	Link	Link	@uco.btc-d	Repeat Content
14	Link	Link	@honor9lite	Reward Farming
15	Link	Link	@hkstemit	Reward Farming
16	Link	Link	@soozen	Reward Farming
17	Link	Link	@steem-bas	Reward Farming
18	Link	Link	@shahzad-khan	Reward Farming
19	Link	Link	@sher-khan	Reward Farming
20	Link	Link	@yesno	Reward Farming

Each content goes through a variety of tools that serve to verify the authenticity of the content of each publication.

Search Tools.

Plagiarism Detectors	AI Content Detectors
quetext	openai
etxt.biz	zerogpt
plagiarismchecker	gptzero
plagiarismdetector	contentatscale
check-plagiarism	Paraphrasingtool
prepostseo	Crossplag
smallseotools

To conclude my report, it is necessary to point out that in each case identified, I leave in the comment a link to the @abuse-watcher publication where some information and advice on plagiarism and abuse is shared.

I appreciate the confidence of the Steem-watcher team, we are at your service.