You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What do you think about this?
Thank you for this @rex-sumon.
A quick check of a sample of the accounts confirms they are commonly using AI generated content for the purpose of vote farming.
It is disappointing to see some leading accounts voting for some of the posts.
For example... @stef1 @moh.arif @yousafharoonkhan @kingporos
Some serious lapse of judgement and lack of scrutiny perhaps?
Something I noticed when looking at these accounts in the past is that they all had high reputations with low follower counts and low numbers of comments/replies. Screening for accounts like that might make it easier to identify future operations like this earlier.
High reputation/low followers definitely seems like a red flag... although it wouldn't be hard to create some fake followers, so that's not a cure-all by itself.
As I am following a some curation trail, that's probably voted automatically on these accounts, immediately, now I unfollowed this trail, Thanks For your strong reminder.
@rex-sumon - what is happening with this group of AI content creating accounts?
They appear to be continuing doing the same.
Is your Abuse Watcher team taking any action to deter them?
We first give several warnings. We try our best to correct their mistakes. Sometimes we warn an abuser more than 3 times.
We have done the same in this case. We have given multiple warnings on each account. Our rules are that if they do not improve after enough warnings, we put them under observation for a few days. Then we think about DV. But in this case the case is different.
We have already tried to contact their team. Our primary interest is to resolve the issue in the most peaceful way possible. I tried twice to talk to them. Sadly they did not respond.
We welcome any suggestions from you.
If they have not responded to any of your messages or contact attempts, then your only options are to either let them continue or take more direct action with your voting power.
Thanks for your feedback.
Our founder @rme has called a meeting on this matter today. We hope that a decision will be taken in this meeting.
Good evening boss, I just want to inform you that the image server is down and authors can't make quality post because that. Please if it's possible kindly inform the engineering team about the issues on ground. Thank you very much sir
We want a clear statement from the Steemit team stating how we will treat ai content. What is it? In which category do we put it and what should be its punishment? If there is any statement from @steemitblog we will take action accordingly. There should be a clear statement on this from the official side of the platform.
We will do our best to give them a chance to correct it before using the downvote power.
We consider AI generated content to be another form of plagiarism - especially when used for the purpose of reward farming.
Therefore none of the Steemcurator0x accounts should give vote rewards to AI generated content.
We will also not be selecting any individuals or communities who use, or allow to be used, AI generated content unless for specific demarcated purposes.
It is up to you and the rest of the community to decide how you want to deal with AI generated content.
Esto ayudará a todos los creadores de contenido a seguir siendo fieles y activos en su actividad en la plataforma, y seguiremos teniendo un ecosistema productivo orgánicamente .
Apoyar la IA con recompensas es apoyar la pereza humana y la viveza de muchos, por ello estaré muy al tanto en cada revisión de contenido que hago como Moderadora para mantener a mi comunidad y steemit limpia y libre de IA y así ayudar a otorgar recompensas a los verdaderos creadores de contenido 😊.
Muchas gracias steemcurator01 por aclarar este punto que nos sirve a todos.
Que tenga un excelente día .
The abuse still continues...
@rex-sumon @abuse-watcher
Disappointing you are not responding to this.
Watching and waiting...
We have some rules of our own. We try to solve the problem in several steps. Previously we decided to downvote when we couldn't stop the abuser. This is done at the very last stage.
@rex-sumon tried to speak to upmewhale's team once again after the day you replied. We want them to solve this problem without any trouble. However, we have not received any reply so far.
When we get to the last stage we call a meeting with the moderators. If there is consensus at the meeting, and if the founder allows, then we take the downvote decision. But we see there are 20 accounts here. There have huge potential rewards. These rewards are too much to kill, Which we don't want to do alone. If we take the decision of downvote , then you also have to be on the side with downvote. A collective downvote will suppress it.
Ss by @rex-sumon
Case has been resolved
https://steemit.com/hive-192912/@abuse-watcher/case-resolved-upmewhale
Sir, This user has been unfollowed. And it has been voted only for the lure of curation trail. But during the vote, its content was not looked at because of a big reward, it happened because of the curation reward . This account has been unfollowed.thank you so much sir for this reminder.
Right now I am following a curation trail that's why voted on these posts. Will surely unfollow. Thank you for the reminder.
Sorry for the late reply due to travel. I published a report and everyone agreed. We are happy to receive your feedback.