You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: An important Report about Evidence of admin misconduct

in STEEM WATCHERlast year (edited)

Hello all,

My first and last statement is that I don't think @malikusman1 has done anything wrong. The thing which is creating issue is that he has shared with the user @tahirazaman (who was acclaimed as the fake acc holder) that she/he has been caught by a detective of Steem Watcher team. Although, it was wrong to disclose this thing before a user but if we think it on the other side, it was done just to guide the user so that he/she could get verified from the detective team.

Talking about the point that you have repeatedly raised about the results of SRs. Sir please, don't take anything in negative sense. I can more precisely understand the way @malikusman1 is saying all this. According to me, there is nothing bad in saying a user that I don't have a big role right now and I hope that I will help you when I will have any role. This is the simple meaning of the chat of malik with the user. So, please don't take the things in the negative sense. If we consider the response of admin, we cannot say that he is doing favour to the account farmers or other abusers, but the only thing that he has done was due to the fact that he wanted to help a helpless user and to get herself verified and I think it's fair from his side because we cannot consider someone as a fake user who is active in our community. So, it was obvious to tell her these all things.

Everything has two different sides and we should have to pick and highlight the positive one instead of the other one. Now, coming to the point, if the user is claiming that he/she is a real user so I think there is no issue in verifying the user again with the best possible way.

I always appreciate the work of the detectives that they are doing for the cleaning and betterment of the platform. But please, don't blame a consistent, hardworking and passionate user who is doing his activities with great care and responsibilities. Summing up the points, the char between the user and the admin is noting but a kind of guide for the user and he is trying to help the user. Although, it was his mistake to disclose the identity of the detective with the user but it was not done intentionally.


Point to be notice:

You are saying that you are constantly received threats from the user. So, here question rises how you get access to the whole chat between the admin and the user (if the person is threatening you then it's not possible that he has shared the whole chat with you). Or may be there is any other twist?


Thank you all, spread happiness and positivity instead of hate and negativity.