The fact that in science the Revolution does not

in #inexplicable7 years ago

"
The fact that in science the Revolution does not speak only lazy daiya reasons for these revolutions, too, did not speak only lazy. I'm wondering here is what the plot knitted part with this that changes to the result and before the pipe-line hich we tie up was always in general, in fact, say that it is not easy to change and not just new theories appear. Yes, it's not just a new language at all forms. Yes, and actually sings the term. The revolution in this plan will have a very successful way of doing the world. We're talking about different types of science th rationality to what types is allocated conditionally speaking a few nonclassical post-non-classical This means that such scientific rationality is the idea that in science, conditionally speaking, in different epochs, there is a value system of some sort of coordinate about what is important that does not matter What can be sacrificed than to sacrifice a slow classical rationality if, again, it is reduced to the fact that there can be given a description of the world as complete exhaustive as possible and in this description there will be nothing its subjective to heat the main Key idea or it comes down to the fact that the whole subjective is a wilderness day before the ideal description of the world does not contain a person related to anything connected to his personal day of experience nothing to create his own personal subjective experience Yes and indeed this is the very explanation of the world Yes she there can only be one right Well, I'm already wrong, yes it's a classical approach, classical science. Yes, she is she actually speaking on this composition is nonclassical rationality. Here we come first because clarification can be several and can not say which one is right Which is wrong or they will all be right Yes, well, here after all scientists Not because they began to think It's not because they decided somehow That's how It's like something to impress Now the thing is that scientists have encountered situations Yes when they could have a complex variety of experiences part of the facts Explain one theory in another part to explain the unicorns