You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: New image in highlight
Yes, sir, it's kind of inflammatory but I just expressed my opinion about what she did because I hadn't told her what I think of the whole issue (and as you see she was expecting me to say something). It's not about the quantity of well-deserved flags, if she did wrong once she can do it again several more, you know what I think, I don't trust her at all. There's a reason why she's not only on the Wally blacklist but also buildawhale and badcontent I think, an account puts people on a blacklist for a reason I think. Or are those two bad reputation accounts? I guess that's why her account is already dead, so to speak. Thank you very much for that final explanatory, it's good to know that.
Greetings!
I repeat friend:
I don't need your trust to be here, I don't give a damn about your trust.
I really don't know who makes me laugh more if you or @Walden.
@Walden is a beach sadist, that's why he's running around with his ridiculous list stalking girls...
I DM'ed this other blacklist, he simply added her for the links that Wally threw up there. IMO it is bad form, but all that really does is disallow her to use the buildawhale bid bot, and whoever else uses the buildawhale's list.
So he added her on the list because of the Wally links without cheking on them? like without checking they are correct? If it's like that of course is a bad form, if he's cheking on them and agreed it was indeed plagiarism it's fine. If I were him I wouldn't like her to use my bid bots. That's logical.
Thanks for weighing in, Indigo...