You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Why the JEWS Rejected JESUS CHRIST as the MESSIAH
The Romans tried to save Jesus but the Jews insisted. The Jews are Turkic primitive and cruel colonizers over the Israelite. By far the Romans were much better colonizers.
Romans were quite good colonizers. At the time, George Soros was not yet born, so there was no reason for the Romans to take orders from the Jews.
lol
The Jews are Turkic just as the Persians who were their creators and avid supporters.
Provoking the Jews meant hostility towards Persians.
The other issue about the Romans, they were mostly sexually perverted and had Jewish partners!
Elagabalus, also known as Heliogabalus, was Roman emperor from 218 to 222 at the age of 14. A member of the Severan dynasty, he was born in Syria, since his early childhood he was screwed by all sorts of men.
Turkic groups sodomized many Romans.
Those must've then been those loudmouth Jews we've got even now who can be found typically arguing over five cent discounts. This particular timeframe aside, do you believe any of them were ever in Egypt?
The Jews are Turkic Mongolians they are totally different ethnicity from the Semite Israelite.
Turkic groups raided and remained in many countries since 650 BC including Egypt.
Regarding the Israelite and Moses, there is still no archeological or human remains to prove they were in Egypt.
The books "scriptures" written by Turkic Jews are totally unreliable.
Unfortunately, the Israelite didn't leave any written history to where they were before coming to Levant or where they wandered.
It is impossible to assume that the Egyptians did not record such great events in many places with enough details.
I agree, I've never seen any evidence to indicate any Jews were ever in Egypt as slaves. Particularly as the Egyptians went so far as to ensure future generations knew exactly which household had so and so many cats. It is hard to actually believe that these other Jews you speak of are Mongolians as, from my understanding of Mongolians, they do not physically resemble any Jews. Also, the Mongolians were known as pretty impressive invaders later on rather than perpetual victims.
I wonder why you, as all people, keep using the term "Jews" to refer to the Israelite, after explained extensively that the Jews are NOT the Israelite, AND the Jews were invented only after 530 BC?
There was not a single Jew in human history before 530 BC, (Judeans and judahites are the people of Judea and the tribe of Judah, they are also not Jews)
Habit mostly. The term 'Jew' has been attributed to a whole group of people based on either religion or/and nationality. There are a lot of assumptions that go with it, such as if someone is labelled as a Jew on their birth certificate then they follow the Jewish faith. By your analysis of these people's origins, the term is incorrect but it is so incorrect throughout the remainder of their history that its blanket use is common now.
I hope now people will start to realize that Jewishness is not religious nor ethnic, it is just a political affiliation bearing religious and ethnic camouflage.
Whenever people read, write, or speak about "Jews" it is always easier and more accurate to replace this new word with the original term which is "Turkic".
And with old Israel, not the present one, better to use "Hebrew Semite". Modern state of Israel is extremely low in Hebrew Semite.