existing stake coinmarket cap claims steem has? you have no fucking clue what you are talking about, as always, one thing is steem tokens, another thing is staked tokens, and another thing is staked steem actively voting witnesses, and you have to add to that how many wits that stake is voting. Get a fucking clue, then talk.
Because she has trouble understanding that the current stake that's actually voting for witnesses is much smaller. @blocktrades has about 45M SP voting for him and he's currently #1.
Let's see, Justin has over 70M at his disposal. I wonder who wins outright unless some magical awakening of the sleeping 200M SP happens.
seems you're so busy being an arrogant dick that you're unaware that this situation has more people than ever voting on Witnesses and watching closely what is going on.
because of what enforcer and I have been talking about ... he can create havoc by voting in his own witness choices leaving everyone else having to combined forces to outvote him ... he could also decide to collapse the stake by selling it off for what he could get and smashing the price ... the witnesses were not willing to wait to see what his intentions are
I have concerns about the SF .. but I get why it was done.
yeah actually I have on the existing stake that coinmarket claims Steem has .. it actually comes to 19% ... any other questions?
existing stake coinmarket cap claims steem has? you have no fucking clue what you are talking about, as always, one thing is steem tokens, another thing is staked tokens, and another thing is staked steem actively voting witnesses, and you have to add to that how many wits that stake is voting. Get a fucking clue, then talk.
Then why the SF
Because she has trouble understanding that the current stake that's actually voting for witnesses is much smaller. @blocktrades has about 45M SP voting for him and he's currently #1.
Let's see, Justin has over 70M at his disposal. I wonder who wins outright unless some magical awakening of the sleeping 200M SP happens.
Exactly why I have always told every one it is not and will never be de-centralized. It is a private company.
seems you're so busy being an arrogant dick that you're unaware that this situation has more people than ever voting on Witnesses and watching closely what is going on.
I recall @yabapmatt had over 90K Mvests voting for him at one point.
So stop pretending you are the only one actually keeping track of stuff.
this conversation ended when you showed yourself to be an arrogant dick ... there is no value in wasting time on the likes of you
You are wrong and that's all there is to it.
I don't need to be arrogant to understand Justin's stake is greater than the current active voting stake in governance.
No, this conversation ended when you demonstrated to be ignorant, thats when it ended.
because of what enforcer and I have been talking about ... he can create havoc by voting in his own witness choices leaving everyone else having to combined forces to outvote him ... he could also decide to collapse the stake by selling it off for what he could get and smashing the price ... the witnesses were not willing to wait to see what his intentions are
I have concerns about the SF .. but I get why it was done.
What about US Code, it is a United States corporation. There is more than just ideals that have to be considered. Only the law matters.