I think somehow you lost the flow of our conversation:

1. You stated that, "Every person will need to become armed, which will lead to increased violence and fatality."

2. I explained that this is false, "Every person does not need to become armed. They could simply pay someone else to defend them."

3. You responded that for people who can't afford to pay, this isn't an option.

But I never said it was an option for everyone or even a solution. I simply pointed out that your statement that everyone needs to become armed is false. Many people can pay others to protect them and so they don't need to become armed.

You can defend your claim or you can admit that your claim was incorrect. But your response is simply changing the subject. You said there was no other option for anyone. I pointed out another option that could work for many people.