Philosophical anthropology also closely coexists and somehow tries to

Philosophical anthropology also closely coexists and somehow tries to divide the subject domain of psychology for example in this and the social anthropology of cultural anthropology. I think that here too there is such an interesting co-existence and how I would denote the demarcation criteria between social philosophy and theoretical sociology and the Philosophical Path this is the way of limiting generalizations in this sense. The subject of Fila is such a limiting abstraction. As a society in general, all such sociologists, they are often engaged in the study of some concrete forms of sociality the family for example whether education or any specific than Russian society Yes, there are such fundamental figures seem to be back Sergei Parsons Sorokin who come out in the process of studying specific societies for some generalizations of some kind of generalizations. After all, you can pass generalizations on philosophical at this moment They are philosophizing so I would say that the difference between theoretical sociology and social philosophy is they and the difference of names is the difference is the procedure of protection within one hundred depending on what is called betamax for example or Sorokin the sociologist of newborns in communication was not when people there are people with the identity of sociologists who were considered to write themselves as sociologists But does at the same time philosophical generalizations or can philosophical hypotheses make predictions and there are people with identical social philosophers who start making sushi