Recap of my weekend (NSFW,uncensored)
Disclaimer: Please mute me if you are easily offended, my posts are intended for open-minded 18+ adults only.
I know I said I'd post this on Monday, but I got halfway through writing it and was really tired, so I decided to finish it today.
I uncensored the photos...cus people aren't happy whether I censor or not.
I'd hope only adults are following me.... but only so much I can do to prevent this, seeing as there is no optional adult content filtering.
So, it's been a really busy past weekend for me!
Did my first "interracial" (IR) scene on Friday... (interracial, meaning black guys)
So if you're racist, speak up now, so I know who to mute!!
My first IR was a DP (double penetration) scene, with Rico Strong & Moe the Monster.
There were some delays with shooting it, since one of the guys had a slight cold, so made staying hard a little difficult for him...But we got through it, and overall, I think the scene went really well and will look amazing once it's edited.
The director for that shoot is a good friend of mine. I was the first girl he shot for his new client (the owner of Blackzilla site), that site hasn't released new content in like 5 years from what I was told, and he is starting a new site called "Too Big to Be True" so director wanted to shoot me for it first since I'm one of his "go-to's" that he knows is reliable & performs well.
Saturday, I shot for Aiden Starr (who is super awesome and an amazing performer herself), I had buttsex with Owen Gray for her upcoming Evil Angel DVD release, Anal Sex Slaves #3 ! That was a great scene, went very efficiently! Owen performed really well, as usual! Like I said in a previous post, we have good sexual chemistry together, so that always makes for a successful scene! Flew to Florida that night, slept very uncomfortably on the plane, plane too warm inside, seats didn't recline, and flew Spirit since only airline that had a direct flight for time frame I was looking for. So of course, Spirit charges a crap ton for luggage, so that's always fun to have to pay excessively for! sarcasm
Got to FL at 5:30am on Sunday. Got set location (also, where I'm staying while out here), and got ready to lay down (which is like 30min-an hour process that involves brushing teeth, pinning bangs to the side/tying hair back, cleansing/toning/moisturizing my face), so I was able to get an hour nap in before my shoot at 9am.
The director got me Starbucks on his way to set, so that was nice of him!
Makeup artist started doing my makeup at like 9:15am, was done around 10am... other girl got there, she was hired to do the intro with me, be tied up, and blowjob in two parts. Her makeup took a lot longer cus she was sick or had allergies or something, so her eyes were watering/make-up kept dripping and not staying in place... so makeup artist kept trying to fix it.
We were finally both done getting ready by like 11:45am... went to a train station, shot some intro footage on train/getting off train with a go pro. Then went to a museum to have a fun day out (part of the storyline), was making selfie videos. Not doing anything sexual, or talking about anything sexual, my butt wasn't even hanging out of the bottom of my shorts either..... and what looked like a homeless lady.... came out of nowhere talking crap to us, saying "This place is for children.", "We should film our porn in a basement somewhere", and called us "skanks". Blew my mind, her porn spidey senses must be on point.... but so ridiculous, that she was talking crap when we weren't even doing anything that would make an average person think we were gonna be making porn. I was just laughing, trying not to laugh too hard so she didn't flip out even more. ahaha, highlight of the day!
Shot some footage inside museum of us smiling and talking about how much fun we were having. The story was , that we left our bags in the taxi and needed help contacting taxi driver to get our stuff back, can't get until the next day, so we were worried about where we were gonna stay since all money was in our bags... so we end up agreeing to go to Hostel XXX... and end up getting tied up/dominated...
The intro part took until around 6:00pm or so, did a rough bj with the other girl in the 'lobby' (I went first, then she went cus I didn't want to get her germs in my mouth since she seemed kinda sick) , didn't end up getting tied up/dominated until around 8pm... just had three 10-minute portions at the end to shoot, tied in diff positions.
The first position I was tied down to a platform, had a hair rope and a neck rope, chest/waist harness, was supposed to use fucking machine, while guy facefucked me... I took behind the scene pics pretending to use the fucking machine, but when I tried actually using it... didn't work out. Something about the dildo or the lube being used was causing a super painful friction burn... I rinsed vagina out with water after, and had to make myself cum so my own lubrication would come down to stop it from hurting. I got flogged really hard directly on my asshole too, during the second part... I yelled so loud. But I can handle pain.
We ended up not getting done until 10pm, due to having to take photos, adjust lighting, and cameras so much in between... at least they didn't have me fully tied up while they were adjusting things, I was just anxious to get those parts over with because it was sooo late in the day already.
13 hours on set. I don't know how I made it through the day.
First of all, I wanna say... The director sent me an extensive questionnaire prior to the shoot asking what is okay and not okay with me to do. I definitely agreed to slapping, face or body..... but the male talent I worked with.. is a good performer, but isn't a proper dom... is misleadingly calling himself a 'Daddy Dom', when he does not have the etiquette required to use that title. He is more of an egotistical sadist, in my opinion. I probably would have been okay with him smacking me in the back of the head... if he had asked me himself if that was okay before actually doing it. Was def not on the questionnaire, so I let the director know after the shoot, that he should add it, or at least tell that guy to ask the females first in the future. Plus, he smacked the back of my head really fucking hard, multiple times. I just didn't get pissed about it at the time, cus I could handle it and I wanted to get the shoot over with and not delay it even more. My brain wasn't fully performing at its best due to lacking of food and sleep and being smack in the head/face too many times that day anyways. I told director yesterday that I plan to tell this male performer to not smack me in the back of the head again, since he never asked consent to initially, I consider that disrespectful. Would prob get triggered and hella mad if he did it again. Director said he will let him know for me, since he is one that is gonna be involved in my four guy gangbang on Friday. Don't get me wrong, I like sadists, and I'm a sadomasochist... but I like sadists that are actual Doms also, I'm only gonna respect/trust them if they ask about do/don'ts first, realize the sub actually has the power, and are people that actually give a shit about human beings... if person doesn't give a shit about themselves, it's not likely they give a shit about others. At least in a professional setting, there's other people around to keep a performer in check if necessary. I just don't see why someone would do something without asking about beforehand at all though, personally. Definitely wouldn't fuck around in my personal life with that particular guy I worked with.
I should bring more snacks on set next time, so if shoot takes forever.. my blood sugar won't crash. Was just kinda bad timing, having the shoots back to back like that... but Saturday was the only day Aiden Starr could shoot me, and I really wanted to shoot for her also, so I made it work.
Still, even though I was thoroughly exhausted by the end, I'm sure the scene will come out amazing when it's edited together!
Oh & great news! Found out over the weekend, I got a second 2017 AVN nomination for "Hottest Newcomer", so fans can vote daily for their top 5 choices. (not expecting to win, just stoked I got nominated)
AND I'm getting a new car finally, once I get back to Vegas! :D
Have to stay out here longer than I planned though, since Team Skeet wants me to shoot a rough lesbian scene for them out here, so I changed my flight to be able to.
But I'm so excited to get home, get a new car, see my boy and get ready for holiday time with him!! <3
Here are some behind the scenes photos I took over the weekend:
Friday-
me & Moe (me & Rico took some, but it was on his snapchat, and I don't think he saved them)
Saturday-
Sunday-
My face by the end of the day, lol
When the director said this part would be 6 mins,
and ended up being 12mins... I really had to pee! :P
Today, from brunch I had, was the best ever (even though you guys prob don't wanna see pics of it)-
Orange, lemon, turmeric, organic ginger root, beet, w/ agave nectar beverage
& bombest French toast ever, with 100% maple syrup! Was so excited about that! haha
Will update again when I get back from Florida! xoxo <3
You will get more support from me if you don't self censor.
Label your posts honestly and use a SFW first image. No one who doesn't want to see adult material will ever see it, unless they lack self control and click the post anyway. The control freaks for whom that isn't good enough can GTFO.
Steemit's gonna get Real Weird as we expand our audience and authorship in the next year and I think these people are doing themselves a favor by fleeing after seeing some gifs of vanilla fucking.
Open the floodgates.
I just had a conversation with @ned about the stuff we can likely expect as the underserved from FB, Reddit, and Twitter start to notice that they can post whatever they want here.
Highlight:
@ned: "What's a furry?"
lol
lmfao
AAAAAAhahahahaha
How would you possibly be able to censor porn? Are you aware that Top 25 posts on Front Page of All on Reddit are porn sometimes? It isn't possible. Too many people upvote it.
I uncensored!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nothing better than uncensored maple syrup!
As a Canadian I am inclined to agree!
saying GTFO is not the right approach. so yeah, you should consider the opinions of other people who feel uncomfortable with penis and vagina flashing right in front of their eyes. not everyone is in masturbation mode. I am not talking about myself. I have no problem with it. My issue is downvoting and turning grays people who express their opinions against nswf posts, whatever their reasons might be. It's not your job or other whales to educate other people about porn and accepting it as a normal of daily life (which pretty much, it is). So yeah, majority is not ready to see these posts in trending page. Maybe later.
How about don't open posts which have "NSFW and uncensored" in the title?
What did you (or they) expect to find behind that description?
I would be 100% in support of what you are saying if the post weren't clearly labeled or worse were mislabeled.
Nobody gets to decide what is "ready" for the Trending page. The misnamed Trending page is the list of posts with the most total unpaid rewards, an objective mathematical calculation, and one that is essential for seeing how the reward pool is being allocated.
The so-called majority that allegedly doesn't want to see what is getting rewards if it happens something they don't like probably should not be looking at that page.
How about don't open the playboy to the nekkid pictures. Thats an effective way to not see the nudity, but how comfortable would you be using it at a PTA meeting or around a bunch of your neighbors.
I'd be uncomfortable defining Steem/it as a PTA meeting. It is a platform with a broad variety of uses (which derives its value in large part from the property of censorship resistance, something almost entirely worthless for PTA meetings).
Those who want a "PTA meeting" experience can limit their use of the platform, for example, by choosing who to follow and only viewing that feed, not the global views.
Curiosity gets the best out of people :)
Note: on a positive note, yeah the post was not so bad so I upvoted this. for everyone who thinks I am narrow-minded.
Post-Note: Life tag is abused in this case. just to be fair.
I don't believe 'Life' tag is being abused.... because I am talking about my life.
Life is what happens outside work :) In the post, you are writing about your work. dont use 5 tags, only the first will be considered :P
No, my life includes my work.
We all have a different perspective ya know.
My work is a part of my life whether you see it that way or not. @thebluepanda
Tag curation would be a good solution to this. People disagree about the meanings of a tag (the sex tag is the perfect example, some people just want to talk about sex while others might think that explicit, pornographic pictures are appropriate). Semantic tag curation would mean that some users could more easily make a strong definition for what a specific tag means and what it doesn't, making it closer to the moderated subs on Reddit.
for the "so-called majority", considering also that most of the votes are from bots.
Oh I agree there. I dismiss entirely any and all claims about 'a majority' based on voting, except a majority of stake.
@smooth
I wish the Steemit Culinary Challenge could also make the trending page if only you would upvote it 120% like you did this post. Yes, I snooped :P and I wondered would the Steemit Culinary Challenge get this much upvote support from you and make it to the trending page if I add an uncensored maple syrup?
But then I also thought - you are already sponsoring it - it would be asking too much and it all boils down to - it's your right to upvote which post you like. Would you please check your chat? Thank you
120%?
@smooth just check chat please thank you
That's not what's on the trending page.
The only people who had penis and vagina flashing in front of their eyes are the ones who chose to click on a post titled: Recap of my weekend (NSFW,uncensored)
oh come on. if people didn't click everything, we would not have hacked accounts lol
Ftr, if there was a scene where it was actually flashing, that would be pretty cool.
saying GTFO is not the right approach. so yeah, you should consider the opinions of other people who feel uncomfortable with penis and vagina flashing right in front of their eyes
I feel uncomfortable with your avatar. Could you please cover up your face, like in Saudi Arabia ? Thanks. You should consider the feelings of millions people which feel uncomfortable to see a woman with a naked face.....
I am not even replying to this. obviously, you know nothing about muslim and their veil
Maybe my message was not clear:
I think now you got it. I give a shit how people practicing Vanity Outrage feels or not. If you don't like how you feel in front of a vagina, it's none of my business. I give a damn of your feelings, because your feelings are not important for me. They are only important for you. And you are not special, not important, not a unique masterpiece, not a unique snowflake to preserve. So, again, I give a shit of your feelings.
And the same about ANY amount of people which feels bad in front of a vagina. I don't care how many they are.
Hope now you are able to understand the message, since the first time it was too difficult for your little brain.
Since you talk about Islam, if you show in Gedda with your face as in the picture, you get arrested. If you want to dispute about Islam, you will find nice people to do it there, pretty competent about islam, and they will give you lot of time to discuss the issue. Into a jail.
Next time, better for you to understand messages until they are polite, instead of pushing people say what they think about you. I say that because you are such a delicate snowflake.
do i need permission to reply?
whatever lol
i think my message is clear too. i couldnt care less about your feelings too. bye bye.
Agree with you.
Like others who live in a real community and have a reputation, I helped many kids from my real life community to join Steemit. My next door neighbor is 13 years old and I convinced her and her mom to join Steemit. By continuing to have hardcore porn on the main facing page of Steemit, this actually impacts my own standing in my community. This site does not say you have to be 18+ to open an account. If that were the case, then I would not care at all. But that is not the case, there are kids on tis site, kids that I helped to get on here. By refusing to follow the rules of putting the NSFW as the first tag, I don't understand how this site can really legally stand behind the fact that kids are on here. It's actually a legal issue: only sites that are 18+ can have hardcore porn on them. Obviously the developers need to find a solution to this or else there could be a legal mess in the near future. I have nothing against contributions to the site as long as the NSFW tag is used first so that children are not seeing this. I am not alone in this either, as Cryptoctopus raised identical concerns. Words are very different from hardcore graphic porn images. You really cannot unsee them.
I encourage you to read up on the latest in legal developments in the US. What you say does not seem to have basis in law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_Internet_pornography#United_States
if the 13 years old owns a smartphone or has access to a pc with Internet, he/she will watch porn either way. doesnt matter where.
Removing things from so-called Trending breaks the voting and reward algorithm and was an ill-considered and inappropriate mechanism to address NSFW content that may be offensive or inappropriate for some users. Better would be a user-option to enable such a filter when appropriate and desired; this could even include locking such a filter under the control of another "parent" account. However, even this mechanism would fail to protect children when inappropriate, illegal, or offensive content is posted and mislabeled.
As a stakeholder, and an adult, I need to see in context the complete list of most voted and rewarded posts (aka Trending) to assess whether the reward pool is being allocated appropriately. Likewise, as a curator, and an adult, I need to see the entire unfiltered stream of New, Hot and Active posts to assess whether those posts are appropriate to upvote or downvote.
If your neighbor has signed up for the site then they do not see Trending as their front page; they see their Feed as the front page. I would highly doubt that it would be appropriate for a child to "follow" @alexanova (nor other adult-content-oriented accounts which might be likely to resteem her posts) and therefore she would never appear on their Feed. It would also likely be inappropriate for a child to view any of the global pages, which could contain any manner of inappropriate, illegal, or offensive content, including those which are unlabeled or mislabeled, before those are downvoted (assuming they eventually are).
Some sections of this site are appropriate for children (i.e. choosing appropriate bloggers to "follow"), but many are not and never will be.
I agree with you that "child-proofing" steemit is not a good basis for what does and does not appear on the global feeds.
My issue with material like this in the global feeds is an issue of the most comfort for the most users. To me, porn is like anchovies. Even if you really, really like anchovies, theyre pretty disgusting when paired with most other foods. They simply don't go with a lot of things.
Youve said (in another thread) that there are billions of people who like porn, and that its a huge industry. And you're correct. But ask yourself this. How many successful websites or other communication media do you know of that routinely offer porn side by side with non-sex-related topics, and are taken seriously for their non-sex-related content?
Take a look at a real, paper-and-ink playboy one of these days. Nude photographs take up maybe 10% of the pages, if that. In fact, its one of the best paying periodicals for (mostly non erotic) fiction and non fiction writing. Yet its a nudie magazine. Most people would be uncomfortable reading one of those well-written articles at work, or around their children, even if their children could not see the pictures. In fact, the guy who says "I read playboy for the articles" is a sitcom joke -- a ridiculous cliche.
How many men do you know who wouldn't be uncomfortable reading a playboy, with the magazine opened to a non-photograph section in a public place like a coffee-shop or hanging out with their girlfriend or around their neighbors. I wouldnt, and i give less of a crap what people think of me than most.
Would you take investment advice from a financial website that had a live stream of one of their brokers giving it to a girl boiler room style under the stock ticker. Would you hire a doctor if she had x-rated pictures of her encounter with "moe the monster" under her CV on her website. (and lest i come off as a misogynist, i also wouldn't hire a dude with pictures of his moe the monster encounter below his CV)
Take a look at a real, paper-and-ink playboy one of these days. Nude photographs take up maybe 10% of the pages, if that. In fact, its one of the best paying periodicals for (mostly non erotic) fiction and non fiction writing. Yet its a nudie magazine. Most people would be uncomfortable reading one of those well-written articles at work, or around their children, even if their children could not see the pictures. In fact, the guy who says "I read the playboy for the articles" is a sitcom joke -- a ridiculous chiche.
Now, i don't speak or vote for everyone, i just speak and vote for me. Me, personally, i watch porn. I have no problem with it. But i have a particular time, a particular place, and a particular headspace where i am comfortable with it. Just like the playboy reader has a time and a place where hes comfortable reading playboy.
Im not necessarily comfortable in starbucks looking at a trending page with articles about alexa tying up moe the monster, even if theyre greyed out and even if I don't click on them.
Now, am I a middle aged american white guy who lives in the suburbs? Sure. And maybe im just super sexually repressed and out-of-touch with mainstream sensibilities. But i feel like there are way more potential users coming from the same headspace I am. To me the refrain this site has a bunch of porn on it. if you don't want porn don't click on it is one thats apt to chase a lot of potential users away.
Just as a side note, up until now, Karl Hungus has always been my go to generic male porn name. But from now on, its going to be Moe The Monster. TIL a cool new porn name.
I'm entirely comfortable with viewing a Trending page in Starbucks that shows a SFW first image and a headline that clearly states "NFSW, uncensored". I just won't be clicking on that post at Starbucks. YMMV.
Look I'm not opposed to features that allow people to customize what they see, and create a family-friendly or work-friendly view if that's what they want. But global view that are intended to show everything that is on the platform (e.g., for curation purposes) should actually show everything that is on the platform (unless specifically customized otherwise).
That said, I also believe that the users you think will be alienated are already well-served by Facebook, etc. If we can also accommodate them by providing filtering and customization, fair enough, but focusing excessively on that market is probably a big mistake.
I am pretty sure that the fact it is not handing "nsfw" if it is the 2-5 tag is actually a glitch in the code. There is an open GitHub issue for the fact that tags are not working correctly, and the nsfw logic is a large part of it.
The community has requested that @alexanova use "nsfw" as one of her tags - which she is doing. IMO, your issue should be with the site, more than with @alexanova. She is following the rules that were given to her by the community.
That aside though, I think that the best solution is to allow each user to chose whether or not they want to view this type of content. It should be hidden by default, and users can enable a setting if they want to view it. That is basically what is being discussed / proposed in https://github.com/steemit/steemit.com/issues/827.
I am not sure it actually is a glitch. Or at least if it is a glitch, it one that seems to make sense on its own terms.
To me, a nsfw tag that is the primary tag (the one that determines the URL) indicates that the primary focus of the content is the NSFW aspect.
Something like sexy santa, or photography that incorporates some nudity, OTOH even though there is a NSFW aspect to it, the NSFW aspect is incidental to the post.
So basically the difference between art and porn. ANd before you ask, i determine the difference the same way potter stewart did.
the solution you mention in your last paragraph seems reasonable to me.
That said, the "issue" with people that elect to downvote this material is an issue with the site as well, and the entirely fictional representation of the downvote as a flag.
What you said about it being the intended behavior makes sense. It could be that way by design. I am hoping the change to allow each user to filter for whether or not they want to see that type of content goes through. It seems like a good compromise that would make both sides happy.
Why should anything legal be hidden by default? Furthermore, who decides what tags are hidden by default? Asking for a friend.
In my opinion Steemit should be a censorship free community where users can post whatever they want. I am not even 100% against 'illegal' content being posted, although I am on the fence about certain types. Who am I to decide though.
Being able to freely post and view content censorship free does not necessarily mean that everyone has to view it though. Being able to chose for yourself whether or not to view something (without having a say in what others can/should do) still falls within the bounds of a censorship free community (IMO).
If we put NSFW content out there without the ability for users who don't want to see it to block it, we are going to alienate a large portion of our potential user base. I would agree that the people that are saying "NSFW content shouldn't be allowed here" are probably better elsewhere, but people who are just upset at not being able to hide it from their kids or co-workers are not necessarily people we want to push away.
There are a lot of ways to make the system more robust and elaborate (like degrees of NSFW content) but I don't think that is really necessary. Just having one "nsfw" tag that allows users to have some control over what does/doesn't get shown by default, seems like a viable solution. There are some gray areas, and a big rabbit-hole to go down as far as "what is really NSFW" - but I do think that a lot of it is fairly black and white. Given the right tools - I think the community can handle it.
[citation needed]I'm not sure if I understand your comment. Are you trying to say that what I said as far as potentially alienating a large portion of our potential user base is just my opinion and may not be factual?
You are shaking things up around here; and I like it!
Jesus H Christ that sounds painful!
Oh and you have an ass that makes me want to jump up on the table, beat my chest and shout; I'm Spartacus!!
:-)
Cg
;*
No, actually wasn't painful! :P
But thank you ! hehehe , I'll take that as a compliment! :D
Thank you for your post! Great read and really interesting to hear how hard you work.
As for the debate over NSFW / porn / sex ... sex is a big part of life and is not something to be locked away in a dark closet.
Do I want my five year old looking at a DP gif? Of course not. Do I want DP gifs on Steemit? Absolutely.
Posts tagged with NSFW require age verified account to view, same as any other adult content. Account holder clicks a check box in account profile indicating they are 18+. Done.
Adult content not tagged NSFW gets downvoted to oblivion by the content police. Responsible, upstanding adult content producers will thrive.
Porn will take Steemit mainstream if it is embraced and managed properly - there is literally no better medium in existence. The potential is tremendous. And while I'm not a programmer when I look at the talent on the dev side I think this community is more than capable of creating a thriving adult content sub that keeps the adult stuff away from the kids.
Bringing porn to Steem is so short sighted and stupid. The internet is full of porn. Oh, yeah, everybody is doing it...Let´s do it! Very original and what a business plan! Some whales are really in just for the money!
And some, also come with the excuse that we need to be open-minded...Haha...Steemit and Inc are loosing a lot of credibility with this move!!!
Do everything and you will achieve nothing!
Honestly, going this way is so un-creative and short term thinking!
Are you serious?
It's not like I'm some guy spamming porn constantly. I'm talking about MY life. Which is porn related, but not entirely. Fuck off.
Haha...I was not judging what you do! You are free to do...
I just think porn is uncreative and very close to the system...
And, I thought that Steemit wanted to emancipate Humans from an old system...
Sorry I did not want to disrupt your business...Haha
I don't see what's so funny... but BYE :)
Way to generalize! Yeah, for the most part, I'd agree, it is uncreative. I don't see how that is relevant to me though. I think working an hourly job is close to the system, in comparison to being a business owner..... but that's just my point of view. Save your comments like this for people that post porn content without any thoughtful text.
Well...you know I totally understand your interest for Steemit! And, I am sure it is maybe very adapted... I simply think that porn is a "special" business. I do not understand why Steemit Inc does not open Steemporn or so...
But, mixing the two will not bring unity and broad public.
Developers just need to implement an optional adult content filtering system already!!
I'm one of your "haters"/"bigots". Or at least, im one of the people that downvoted your content. I'm also one of the people you called a faggot, and encouraged others to retaliate against, by proxy.
I really don't consider myself a bigot. I am probably friends with more adult performers than most of the people that voted for your post. Like you, I am a vegas local. I lived for quite a while in Sky and the Meridian, and both developments had a significant adult industry population. And my dog is pretty much a stripper magnet. Not in a gross way though, just they all think hes cute.
That said, i don't hate you. In fact, i would have been inclined to upvote the text of your article on its own merits, because i think there are parts of it that are genuinely interesting... like what makes someone an "egotistical sadist" vs a "proper dom".
Im only posting here to point out a simple fact. I downvoted your content because i don't agree with there being porn in the global feeds, at least not as high up as yours is. My view point is not the only viewpoint, but its mine. And my vote was just that. A vote. Not an expression of hatred or bigotry. I have seen your biggest supporter, @smooth (well, your biggest supporter is probably Moe the Monster, but your highest steem power supporter) downvote or threaten to downvote others for the same reason.
Its unfortunate that the UI represents this vote as a flag (and therefore an expression of the opinion that your material should not be on the site at all). But like filtering, thats a website problem. In fact, if I had thought my downvote would hide your post, i would not have cast it.
As a side note:
Kind of insane that she would get upset over something PG rated. That said, Im gonna go way out on a limb and guess that "moe the monster" looks like a porn star even when he has a pair of pants covering up the feature that earned him his moniker.
Why would you need to guess when there's picture posted? But okay. I disagree with the flagging justification, but noted. Just mute me????
there's a** picture
Okay, I am going to say my thing, which is not against porn, IR or DP or whatever. It against not being able to read what seems to be like interesting content because writers do not break their text into paragraphs.
Please do. Please break your text into paragraphs. Otherwise it's like you are asking me to read the whole thing without breathing.
Did my best to break into paragraphs, don't know if I did that right! ahhaha, but maybe. I tried.
Try not putting spaces in front (to the left) of the text - when you do that it marks it as preformatted and doesn't wrap the lines, making it a horizontal scroll mess.
https://github.com/adam-p/markdown-here/wiki/Markdown-Cheatsheet
Oh sorry!
Was just trying to be grammatically correct, by indenting paragraphs. >.<
Good call, but Markdown formatting is a little bit different.
@orenshani7 really?
Great post @alexanova Thanks for sharing!
@rawnetics: maybe he's here for the text...
Ha Ha @anduweb I think so!
Yes, really.
Usually I would wholeheartedly agree with you; however I am so fascinated by all of this, that I am happily trawling through the nobreak paragraphs :-)
Cg
I wish I could do the same because she facenates me too. But really, am I asking for too much?
Well this is a girl who can take a DP with "Moe The Monster" after an overnight flight, after just a single hour of sleep. I think insisting on paragraphs is probably an ask too far.
Just enjoy the words and pics for now; I'm sure her formatting style will improve; as far as prose and subject matter though; she's 10/10 so far. :-)
Cg
I applouse her for what she can do. Really.
Thank you guys <3 @cryptogee @orenshani7
oops sry! I do ramble a lot when I write. I will try to improve my paragraph structures. >.<
It was a pleasure having breakfast with you! Those pancakes were the BOMB!
Yes indeed! :P likewise!
Hope you enjoy Steemit! xox
I know you have been getting a lot of negative attention directed at you from the users that are not comfortable with this type of content being shown on the site.
I thought you would be interested in this update on how they are proposing to handle NSFW content, which should hopefully alleviate a large part of the issue:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@timcliff/steemit-com-development-update-special-edition-nsfw-issue