RE: ARE WE ALL TOO SCARED TO POST ANYTHING CONTROVERSIAL ON STEEMIT?
Thanks mate - that means a lot coming from you!
Why does Japan have one of the lowest cancer rates in the world?
Why does Israel have one of the highest rates of skin cancer in the world when semites have olive/dark skin and should not be as susceptible to skin cancer as they are?
Israel is like Australia - white men living in the desert is not natural which explains why both countries rank so highly in skin cancer cases.
And, we were told that Chernobyl would be uninhabitable for 10,000 years but someone forgot to tell the flora and fauna that seem to be flourishing there. This doco contains a fair bit of disinfo eg anyone can bury a bit of radioactive material under the ground and lie a wolf on top of it and get a geiger counter to register a reading. My eyes tell me that the wildlife in Chernobyl is flourishing but TBH I haven't researched this topic enough to be absolutely sure what is going on - but I certainly am very suspicious.
There is some really odd stuff going on with skin cancer - NZ (land of the long white cloud) is off the charts - worse than Aussie
That is strange, I didn't know that. There are lots of different charts and reports but I believe you. It's a topic that I've wanted to blog about but I need to to do more research and frankly - there are other things and topics more important to me atm. I'm quite sure that what is going on in NZ ties into the depopulation agenda.
As you would imagine - it's a real rabbit hole:
"In New Zealand, melanoma rates have nearly doubled in the past 30 years, with about 50 cases per 100,000 people in 2011.
That puts our rate well in excess of Australia's, which peaked at 49 per 100,000 in 2005, and has since declined"
Well that is fascinating.
I do know that Australia has been running 'slip, slop, slap' ad campaigns for as long as I can remember. Slip on a shirt, slop on a hat and slap on sunscreen'.
I don't know of how much a role these 'public education/awareness campaigns' have played in reducing the number of cases in Oz but I thought it was worth mentioning.
"Oxybenzone and other vague mystery chemicals are found amongst a wide variety of name brand sunscreens, with many of these having yet to be proven as safe to use at all. About 8 percent of all sunscreens have been quality tested by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) to be both safe and effective for the intended use, whereas the other 92 percent contain at least one (if not many more) of the ingredients designated as detrimental for human use, further adding to the worry if sunscreen causes cancer.
This means the public not only has been encouraged to buy something that is known to be detrimental for at least a decade, but is only left with a selection that is 8% safe"
http://naturalsociety.com/sunscreen-causes-cancer-what-you-may-not-know-about-sunscreen/
Yeah, I knew about that and thought of it has I was commenting. I didn't know the stats about the 8% though.